<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Blog article &#8211; CanvasLogic</title>
	<atom:link href="https://canvaslogic.com/category/blog-article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://canvaslogic.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 08:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>What Is CPQ Data Analysis? A Guide to Smarter Sales Decisions</title>
		<link>https://canvaslogic.com/what-is-cpq-data-analysis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Sheardown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 15:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canvaslogic.com/?p=2788</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A promising customer asks for a quote. Your team assembles the product, adjusts the price, gets approval, and sends the proposal. Then comes the familiar question: will they buy?]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-7387b849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<div class="wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group has-gray-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-1 is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group has-gray-background-color has-background is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Key Facts</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>CPQ data analysis examines product configurations, prices, discounts, and quotes to help businesses understand sales results.</li>



<li>Useful metrics cover conversion, deal value, profitability, and the time needed to move a sale forward.</li>



<li>Connecting CPQ with CRM and ERP data helps link quoted offers to customer decisions and actual orders.</li>



<li>Reliable analysis depends on consistent definitions, complete records, and someone acting on the findings.</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A promising customer asks for a quote. Your team assembles the product, adjusts the price, gets approval, and sends the proposal. Then comes the familiar question: will they buy?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One quote offers a few clues. Hundreds reveal patterns. Perhaps a popular upgrade rarely makes it into the final order. Perhaps routine approvals leave customers waiting. Perhaps your busiest sales team wins plenty of business but gives away too much margin.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="/cpq-software/">CPQ</a> data analysis helps you investigate those questions — and decide what to change.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is CPQ Data Analysis?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ data analysis is the process of examining information from configure, price, and quote software to understand buying patterns, evaluate quoting performance, and improve sales decisions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ handles the mechanics: selecting compatible products, applying pricing rules, and producing quotes. Analysis examines what happens across those activities. It can reveal which configurations sell, where discounts accumulate, and where proposals stall. Available reporting varies by platform and connected analytics tools.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Think of a furniture manufacturer selling custom desks. Sales totals show how many desks customers bought. CPQ analytics can help explain which finishes they selected, how often they requested revisions, and whether higher discounts accompanied more wins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That last detail needs care. A pattern suggests something worth investigating; it does not automatically explain the cause.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="678" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-Data-Analytics-1024x678.jpg" alt="People analyzing graphics and diagrams" class="wp-image-2794" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-Data-Analytics-1024x678.jpg 1024w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-Data-Analytics-300x199.jpg 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-Data-Analytics-767x508.jpg 767w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-Data-Analytics-1536x1017.jpg 1536w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-Data-Analytics-2048x1356.jpg 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Does CPQ Data Analysis Work?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ data analysis works by collecting quote records, connecting related information, and comparing results over time. The work may happen inside the CPQ platform, in a separate analytics application, or across both.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A practical workflow has four steps:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Capture:</strong> Record configurations, quoted prices, revisions, approval events, and timestamps.</li>



<li><strong>Connect:</strong> Match quotes to CRM opportunities and ERP orders using shared identifiers.</li>



<li><strong>Analyze:</strong> Calculate metrics and compare products, customer groups, channels, or periods.</li>



<li><strong>Act:</strong> Investigate a finding, adjust a rule or process, and measure what follows.</li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Suppose quotes for custom desks take longer than standard ones. Breaking down the timeline might reveal that an optional accessory triggers an unnecessary approval. The useful discovery is the specific delay your team can fix.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Types of Data Can CPQ Systems Analyze?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ analysis can cover product, pricing, quote, and customer data. Some information originates in CPQ; customer history, actual costs, and final order outcomes may require integrations.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Data type</strong></td><td><strong>Examples</strong></td><td><strong>Business use</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Product configuration data</td><td>Selected options, dependencies, incompatible selections if logged</td><td>Identify popular combinations and recurring configuration difficulties</td></tr><tr><td>Pricing and discount data</td><td>List prices, negotiated prices, discount amounts</td><td>Evaluate pricing decisions and protect margins</td></tr><tr><td>Quote and sales data</td><td>Quote values, statuses, revisions, acceptance outcomes</td><td>Measure quoting performance and locate delays</td></tr><tr><td>Customer and deal data</td><td>Industry, company size, purchase history, opportunity stage</td><td>Compare buying patterns across customer segments</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Capture unsuccessful journeys, too, where tracking permits. Accepted quotes tell you what customers chose. Abandoned configurations and rejected proposals help you investigate what got in their way.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Which CPQ Metrics Should Businesses Track?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses should track quote conversion rate, average deal size, discount rate, gross profit margin, quote approval time, and sales cycle length. Together, these metrics show whether quotes turn into orders, how much value those orders bring, how profitable they are, and where delays occur. Reviewing them together helps you spot trade-offs, such as winning more deals by offering discounts that leave too little profit.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Metric</strong></td><td><strong>What it measures</strong></td><td><strong>Why it matters</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Quote conversion rate</td><td>Share of distinct issued quotes that become orders within a defined observation window</td><td>Shows how effectively quotes generate sales</td></tr><tr><td>Average deal size</td><td>Total booked value of won deals divided by their number</td><td>Tracks changes in deal value and sales mix</td></tr><tr><td>Discount rate</td><td>Reduction from the applicable list price, expressed as a percentage</td><td>Makes pricing concessions visible</td></tr><tr><td>Gross profit margin</td><td>Revenue minus cost of goods sold, divided by revenue</td><td>Shows the share of revenue retained after direct product costs</td></tr><tr><td>Quote approval time</td><td>Elapsed time from approval submission to final decision</td><td>Identifies internal waiting time</td></tr><tr><td>Sales cycle length</td><td>Time from a defined opportunity starting point to closure</td><td>Shows how long deals take to progress</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Quote conversion rate and average deal size</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a group of 100 distinct issued quotes, 40 resulting orders mean a 40% conversion rate. Give that group enough time to mature, show pending quotes separately, and count revisions under the original quote.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Average deal size needs context. A rise may reflect successful upselling—or simply one unusually large order. Compare similar product groups and customer segments before deciding that a sales approach is working.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Discount rate and profit margin</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Discount rate is <strong>(list value − net selling value) ÷ list value × 100</strong>. For an overall rate, use total values rather than averaging percentages from differently sized deals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Imagine a $10,000 order with $7,000 in direct costs. Its gross margin is 30%. A 10% discount reduces the price to $9,000 and gross profit to $2,000, leaving a margin of about 22.2%, assuming costs stay unchanged.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why discounts and margins belong together. Label quote-stage margins as estimates, then compare them with actual results when cost data becomes available.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Quote approval time and sales cycle length</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Approval time isolates an internal step; sales cycle length covers a broader journey. Define the start and finish of each before comparing teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Review the median alongside the average so a few unusually slow deals do not obscure everyday experience. Separate internal waiting from time spent awaiting a customer response.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Does CPQ Data Analysis Improve Business Performance?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ data analysis helps businesses protect margins, prepare quotes faster, and build more realistic sales forecasts. It shows where discounts reduce profitability, which configuration or approval steps slow down quoting, and whether proposed deal values and closing dates match the available evidence. Teams can use these findings to refine pricing rules, remove unnecessary work, and adjust forecasts as opportunities develop.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Pricing and margin optimization</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Compare discounts with conversion and margin within similar deals. If deeper concessions accompany little improvement in wins, review the discount policy. Account for differences such as order volume and customer type before drawing conclusions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Historical pricing data can also inform discount guidance where the software supports it. Keep recommendations within approved commercial rules and review their results.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Faster quote creation</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Track time to the first customer-ready quote and the number of revisions. Repeated corrections may point to unclear options, missing specifications, or outdated pricing data.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once the cause is clear, improve configuration guidance or automate a repetitive step. CPQ provides the quoting automation; analysis helps identify where additional changes would save the most effort.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Better sales forecasting</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ data adds quoted products, prices, and revision activity to the CRM pipeline. These details can help teams question deal values and expected closing dates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A large proposal that keeps shrinking deserves a closer look. So does a deal scheduled to close tomorrow when approval is still pending. Use historical outcomes to inform forecasting, while keeping quoted value, booked orders, and recognized revenue distinct.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Is CPQ Data Integrated With Other Business Systems?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ data is integrated through supported connectors, APIs, or scheduled data transfers. The goal is to connect the same customer, quote, and order across systems without duplicate entry or conflicting records.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">CRM and ERP integration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CRM typically supplies customer and opportunity context. CPQ adds configuration and quote details. ERP supplies operational information such as costs, orders, and fulfillment records, depending on the integration.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agree which system owns each field. For example, CRM might own the opportunity stage, while ERP owns actual product costs. Map customer, product, quote, and order identifiers, including which quote version became the order.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then test realistic situations: a revised quote, a canceled order, and a changed customer record. Assign someone to resolve failed transfers.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Business intelligence integration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A business intelligence platform brings CPQ data together with other sources for broader reporting. Teams can compare quoted margins with actual margins or explore conversion across channels.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data may flow directly into reporting tools or through a central data warehouse. Choose refresh intervals based on the decisions involved, display the last update time, and restrict sensitive cost and customer information to appropriate users.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Can Businesses Implement CPQ Data Analysis Successfully?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To implement CPQ data analysis successfully, start with a specific sales problem and choose metrics that will show whether it improves. Standardize product, pricing, and quote records, connect the necessary systems, and check the data for accuracy. Then build dashboards around everyday decisions and test them with one team or product line. Assign owners to act on findings, review results, and refine the approach before expanding.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Define goals and select metrics</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Choose a problem people recognize: approvals take too long, for example. Establish a baseline, choose the relevant metric, and assign an owner who can make changes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Pair improvement targets with a balancing measure. Faster approvals should still preserve acceptable margins. Higher conversion should not depend on uncontrolled discounts.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Standardize sales data</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agree on product codes, quote statuses, currencies, units, and the meaning of “won.” Record quote versions and timestamps consistently.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For subscription businesses, distinguish annual contract value from total contract value. For international sales, document currency conversion rules. Check a sample of reports against original quotes and orders before asking colleagues to rely on them.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Build and refine actionable dashboards</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Build dashboards around decisions. A sales manager needs stalled quotes and pending approvals; a pricing manager needs discount and margin exceptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let users open the underlying records. Discuss insights with the people doing the work, agree on an action, and check the result later. Remove charts that nobody uses. A small dashboard that changes a decision earns its place.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Choose CanvasLogic for CPQ Solutions?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic helps businesses make complex products easier to understand and quote by combining interactive <a href="/configuration-software/">3D</a> and <a href="/ar-product-configurator/">AR</a> visualization, rules-based configuration, dynamic pricing, and automated proposals. Customers can explore their options while sales teams spend less time checking combinations and preparing quotes manually. Connections with CRM, ecommerce, product information, and analytics tools also help bring configuration and quoting data into the wider sales process.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Conclusion</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ data analysis helps teams make better decisions about the offers they create and the business they win. Start with one question worth answering, connect the necessary records, and act on what you learn. Progress becomes easier to see when the numbers relate to a problem your team knows firsthand.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">FAQ</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">How often should CPQ reports be updated?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Match updates to the decision. Pending approvals may need near-real-time visibility, while daily updates may suit pipeline reviews. Weekly or monthly reporting can support pricing reviews. Always show when the underlying data was refreshed.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Is CPQ analytics suitable for small businesses?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yes, especially when complex products or frequent quoting create recurring problems. Start with a few useful measures. A small business with limited quote volume should examine individual deals alongside percentages, which can fluctuate sharply in small samples.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Can AI automate CPQ analytics and reporting?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI can assist with report summaries and questions about connected sales data. For example, Power BI Copilot generates summaries grounded in report content. Availability depends on your tools and setup. Keep people responsible for checking calculations, interpreting findings, and approving pricing changes.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">How long does it take to implement CPQ analytics?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is no fixed timeline. For planning, a limited pilot with clean, accessible data may fit into weeks; a broader project involving integrations and historical data cleanup may require months. Confirm the estimate after assessing data quality, reporting scope, and testing needs.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web-Based Product Configurator: A Smarter Way to Customize Products</title>
		<link>https://canvaslogic.com/web-based-product-configurator/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Sheardown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 16:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canvaslogic.com/?p=2772</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Insights: Buying a customizable product should feel exciting — not like solving a difficult puzzle. Imagine buying a kitchen, industrial machine, laboratory system, window, sofa, bicycle, or computer. There may be dozens — or hundreds — of choices. Which size fits? Which motor works with which frame? Can this material be used outdoors? Is that [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-7387b849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<div class="wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group has-gray-background-color has-background is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Insights:</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>A web-based product configurator allows customers, dealers, or sales teams to build a product online. They can choose dimensions, colors, materials, components, accessories, services, and other options.</li>



<li>The software can check each choice against product rules. Impossible combinations are blocked before they become expensive mistakes.</li>



<li>Interactive visualization can have a real commercial effect. Shopify reports that merchants using 3D content have experienced an average 94% conversion lift on its platform, although individual results naturally vary by product, traffic, implementation, and customer base. </li>
</ul>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Buying a customizable product should feel exciting — not like solving a difficult puzzle.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Imagine buying a kitchen, industrial machine, laboratory system, window, sofa, bicycle, or computer. There may be dozens — or hundreds — of choices. Which size fits? Which motor works with which frame? Can this material be used outdoors? Is that accessory compatible? What will everything cost?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Web-based product configurator software turns those questions into a guided digital journey. The customer chooses what they need. The software checks the choices, updates the product, changes the price, and can prepare a quote or order.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is a Web-Based Product Configurator?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A web-based product configurator is an interactive tool. It helps a user customize a product directly in an internet browser. It presents the available options, checks whether they work together, shows how the product will look, calculates the correct price, and may create a quote or order when the configuration is complete.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Does a Web-Based Product Configurator Work?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A web-based product configurator takes the user&#8217;s choices first. Then it compares them with the stored product rules. The next step is to update the product, visual model, and price in real time. Once the selection is valid, it saves the configuration and passes the information to quoting, ordering, customer management, or production systems.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><th><strong>Stage</strong></th><th><strong>What the user does</strong></th><th><strong>What the software does</strong></th><th><strong>Result</strong></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1. Start</td><td>Opens the configurator and selects a product or need</td><td>Loads the relevant model, options, prices, and rules</td><td>The user sees a suitable starting point</td></tr><tr><td>2. Customize</td><td>Chooses dimensions, materials, parts, colors, or accessories</td><td>Checks every choice against compatibility and business rules</td><td>Only valid combinations remain available</td></tr><tr><td>3. Visualize</td><td>Rotates, zooms, or changes the product</td><td>Updates a 2D or 3D view immediately</td><td>The final design becomes easier to understand</td></tr><tr><td>4. Price</td><td>Adds or removes options</td><td>Recalculates costs, discounts, taxes, or customer-specific prices</td><td>The user sees an accurate current price</td></tr><tr><td>5. Complete</td><td>Saves, shares, or submits the configuration</td><td>Creates a quote, product code, bill of materials, or order record</td><td>Sales and operational teams receive structured data</td></tr><tr><td>6. Continue</td><td>Returns later or contacts sales</td><td>Reopens the saved configuration and keeps its history</td><td>The conversation continues without starting again</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Are the Benefits of a Web-Based Product Configurator?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The biggest benefit is simple: it makes a complicated product easier to buy and easier to sell<strong>. </strong>That matters because digital buyers want speed, but complexity can create uncertainty. Gartner&#8217;s research shows that buyers increasingly prefer self-service, yet self-service without enough support can lead to poor decisions and purchase regret.&nbsp; A well-designed configurator can provide the missing guidance.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Personalized customer experience</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of forcing every buyer through the same product page, a configurator responds to what that person actually needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That matters because McKinsey found that 71% of consumers expect personalized interactions and 76% become frustrated when companies fail to provide them. McKinsey also found that 78% said personalized content made them more likely to repurchase.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a business, configuration is a particularly useful form of personalization because the customer supplies the information directly: “I need this size, this environment, this budget, and this function.”</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="960" height="960" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/Web-based-product-configurator.webp" alt="71% of customers expect personalized interactions" class="wp-image-2774" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/Web-based-product-configurator.webp 960w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/Web-based-product-configurator-300x300.webp 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/Web-based-product-configurator-150x150.webp 150w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/Web-based-product-configurator-768x768.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px" /></figure>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Accurate product visualization</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">People find it easier to understand something they can see. With 3D visualization, a customer can rotate a product, inspect details, change colors, swap materials, add modules, and see the result immediately.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AR goes a step further by placing a digital version of the product in the buyer&#8217;s physical environment. Research comparing AR with standard web shopping finds that AR&#8217;s interactivity, vividness, and spatial presence can strengthen user experience and purchase intention.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are also useful commercial examples. Shopify says merchants with 3D content have experienced an average 94% conversion lift on its platform. Gunner Kennels reported that introducing 3D and AR was followed by a 40% increase in order conversion and a 5% drop in return rate. Those are specific platform/company outcomes rather than universal benchmarks, but they demonstrate the possible scale of the opportunity.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="960" height="960" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/Web-configurator.webp" alt="Shopify says merchants with 3D content experience a significant conversion lift. " class="wp-image-2780" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/Web-configurator.webp 960w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/Web-configurator-300x300.webp 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/Web-configurator-150x150.webp 150w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/Web-configurator-768x768.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px" /></figure>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Fewer configuration errors</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Complex products can fail because of one small detail: the wrong component, missing accessory, incompatible material, incorrect voltage, unsuitable dimension, or outdated option.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A configurator can encode those relationships as rules and prevent users from selecting combinations the company cannot produce or deliver.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not just a sales issue. Bad data can become expensive once it travels into operations. IBM reports that 43% of surveyed chief operating officers identified data-quality issues as their most significant data-management challenge.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Higher conversion rates</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A buyer who understands a product is in a stronger position to say yes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Interactive visualization, guided choices, immediate feedback, and transparent pricing can remove some of the uncertainty that makes customers abandon a purchase.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The evidence should be interpreted carefully: no configurator can guarantee a conversion lift. Results depend on product-market fit, traffic quality, design, performance, price, and many other factors. Still, experimental research finds stronger purchase intention with rotatable product imagery than with static images, while Shopify&#8217;s merchant data points to potentially meaningful conversion gains from 3D experiences.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Faster sales processes</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A normal complex sale may involve several rounds of questions:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Can we have this in another size?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Does that part work with this model?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What is the new price?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Can you resend the quote?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Can we see it with a different finish?”</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A configurator can answer many of those questions instantly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That matters when Salesforce estimates that sales representatives spend about 60% of their time on non-selling work.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What Types of Web-Based Product Configurators Are Available?</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The main types are visual, rule-based, CPQ, and guided selling configurators. Each focuses on a different part of the buying process, although modern solutions often combine all four to support both simple consumer choices and complex B2B sales.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><th>Type</th><th>Main purpose</th><th>Best suited to</th><th>Simple example</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Visual configurator</td><td>Shows changes as users make selections</td><td>Products where appearance matters</td><td>Changing the fabric and legs of a sofa</td></tr><tr><td>Rule-based configurator</td><td>Keeps technical combinations valid</td><td>Products with many dependencies</td><td>Matching a machine with the correct motor</td></tr><tr><td>CPQ configurator</td><td>Automates configuration, price, and quote</td><td>Complex or negotiated B2B sales</td><td>Producing a priced proposal for lab equipment</td></tr><tr><td>Guided selling configurator</td><td>Recommends a suitable solution through questions</td><td>Buyers who do not know the product range</td><td>Suggesting a storage system based on room size</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Visual configurators</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Visual configurators use 2D images, 3D models, or augmented reality. They are useful when color, shape, placement, or finish strongly influences the buying decision.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Rule-based configurators</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rule-based tools focus on technical accuracy. Their logic marks components as required, optional, compatible, or forbidden, guiding users toward a product the company can supply.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">CPQ configurators</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="/cpq-software/">CPQ</a> means configure, price, quote. These tools connect product selection with pricing, discounts, approvals, and document generation to create a commercial proposal.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Guided selling configurators</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Guided selling begins with the customer&#8217;s problem. It asks plain questions and recommends a product, package, or configuration that matches the answers.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Which Industries Use Web-Based Product Configurators?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Web-based configurators are used wherever products have many possible combinations or require expert guidance. They are common in manufacturing, furniture, automotive, construction, healthcare, retail, and technology because these sectors must balance customer choice with technical, pricing, and production rules.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Industrial manufacturing</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Manufacturers use configurators for machinery, storage systems, production lines, and other engineered products. Buyers can select capacity or dimensions while the software checks components and prepares accurate technical data.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Furniture and interior design</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Customers can change fabrics, finishes, layouts, and sizes while viewing the result in 3D. Augmented reality may also place the configured furniture inside a real room through a phone or tablet.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Automotive and mobility</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vehicle configurators organize models, engines, colors, trim levels, equipment packages, and financing choices. Rules make sure that the selected features are available together in the chosen market.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Construction and building materials</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Doors, windows, kitchens, modular buildings, and facade systems depend on precise measurements and compatible materials. A configurator helps collect these details and can generate a structured request or quote.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Medical and laboratory equipment</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Laboratories and healthcare organizations often buy equipment with complex accessories and site requirements. Guided questions can identify a suitable setup while rules reduce the chance of missing a necessary component.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Consumer goods and retail</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Retailers use configurators for products such as shoes, bicycles, jewelry, and sports equipment. The interactive experience makes customization engaging while giving the seller clean order data.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Electronics and technology</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Computers, control systems, and electronic assemblies contain parts with clear dependencies. A rule-based configurator can match processors, memory, power supplies, cables, licenses, and service packages correctly.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Which Features Should a Web-Based Product Configurator Include?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A good configurator needs an accessible interface, clear visuals, reliable rules, guided workflows, accurate pricing, quote generation, localization, saved configurations, and analytics. Every feature should simplify the journey or improve the resulting data.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Responsive user interface</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The interface should work on computers, tablets, and phones. Clear labels, readable text, suitable touch targets, and a logical order show users what to do next.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Real-time 2D and 3D visualization</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Visuals should change when a user selects an option. 2D suits simpler products, while <a href="/configuration-software/">3D</a> helps when shape, detail, or viewing angle matters.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Constraint-based configuration rules</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Constraints define what is possible. They prevent conflicts, add required parts, explain blocked choices, and ensure that a finished configuration can be produced.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Guided selling workflows</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A guided workflow breaks a large decision into manageable questions. It explains unfamiliar terms, recommends suitable options, and hides irrelevant technical choices.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Dynamic pricing and discounting</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The price should change when the product changes. Strong pricing tools can also handle quantities, customer groups, currencies, regional taxes, promotions, optional services, and discounts that require approval.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Automated quotes and proposals</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The system should turn a completed configuration into a clear document or online proposal. Useful outputs include product details, visuals, prices, terms, validity dates, and links that reopen the exact configuration.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Multilingual and multicurrency support</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">International companies need more than translated buttons. Product descriptions, units, prices, taxes, documents, and regional availability should all adapt to the selected language and market.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Saved, shared, and reopened configurations</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Buyers rarely finish a complex purchase in one visit. A saved link or account record lets them return later, compare versions, ask a colleague for feedback, or share the design with a sales representative.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Analytics and customer behavior tracking</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analytics reveal where users stop, which options they prefer, and which configurations lead to quotes or orders. These findings can guide improvements to the product range, interface, pricing, and sales follow-up.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Does a Web-Based Product Configurator Support CPQ Processes?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A web-based configurator supports CPQ by combining valid product selection, current pricing, and automatic quote creation in one connected flow. It captures what the buyer needs, applies technical and commercial rules, calculates the correct amount, and produces a proposal that sales teams can review, approve, and send.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Can It Integrate with Ecommerce, CRM, and ERP Systems?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A configurator integrates with ecommerce, CRM, and ERP systems through APIs, software connectors, embedded components, or middleware. These connections allow products, prices, customer details, stock information, quotes, and orders to move automatically instead of being copied by hand.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">API-based data exchange</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An API is a controlled way for software systems to communicate. It can request a current price, send a saved configuration, or check availability while keeping each application responsible for its own data.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Ecommerce integration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Inside an ecommerce store, the configurator can replace or extend a normal product page. It passes the finished item, selected options, product code, price, and visual preview to the shopping cart and checkout.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">CRM integration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A customer relationship management system, or CRM, stores information about leads and customers. The integration can create a contact, record configuration activity, attach a quote, and alert a salesperson when follow-up is needed.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">ERP integration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An enterprise resource planning system, or ERP, manages core operations such as products, prices, stock, purchasing, and orders. The configurator can receive reliable master data from the ERP and return approved order details.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Real-time pricing and inventory</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Live connections help prevent a configurator from showing an outdated price or unavailable option. Where instant updates are not practical, scheduled synchronization can refresh information at agreed intervals.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Automated quote-to-order flow</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After approval, quote data can become an ecommerce order, ERP sales order, bill of materials, or production request. Clear ownership and validation remain important because an automatic flow should never turn incomplete information into a faulty order.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Are the Main Implementation Challenges? </h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The main implementation challenges are product data quality, complex rules, system integration, visualization performance, and ongoing ownership. A successful project starts with a manageable product range, assigns responsibility for data, and tests the complete journey from the first choice to the final order.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Complex product data and rules</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Product knowledge may be spread across spreadsheets, drawings, price lists, and employees&#8217; experience. Teams must collect it, remove contradictions, define ownership, and translate it into testable rules before automation becomes reliable.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Integration with existing systems</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Different systems may use different product codes, customer records, or pricing logic. Agreeing on a clear source for each type of data prevents mismatches and endless synchronization problems.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Performance and scalability</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Large 3D models and frequent live calculations can slow the user experience. Optimized assets, sensible loading, caching, monitoring, and realistic traffic tests help the configurator remain responsive as demand grows.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Ongoing maintenance</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A configurator is not a one-time brochure. Product options, prices, languages, rules, integrations, and visual assets change, so the business needs a regular update process and named owners after launch.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Should You Choose the Right Web-Based Product Configurator?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Choose a configurator by matching its capabilities to your product complexity, customer journey, sales process, system landscape, and internal resources. A polished 3D demo matters less than reliable rules, usable administration, integration options, performance, security, accessibility, and a realistic ownership model.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><th>Selection question</th><th>What to examine</th><th>Why it matters</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>How complex are our products?</td><td>Number of options, dependencies, calculations, and special cases</td><td>Determines the strength of the rules engine required</td></tr><tr><td>Who will use it?</td><td>Customers, dealers, sales teams, engineers, or several groups</td><td>Shapes the interface, permissions, and guidance</td></tr><tr><td>How important are visuals?</td><td>Need for 2D, 3D, photorealism, animation, or <a href="/ar-product-configurator/">AR</a></td><td>Affects cost, asset preparation, and device performance</td></tr><tr><td>Do we need CPQ?</td><td>Pricing rules, discounts, approvals, quote templates, and signatures</td><td>Defines whether visualization alone is sufficient</td></tr><tr><td>What must it connect to?</td><td>Ecommerce, CRM, ERP, PIM, payment, or manufacturing systems</td><td>Reveals integration scope and data ownership</td></tr><tr><td>Who will manage it?</td><td>No-code tools, roles, training, support, and update workflows</td><td>Determines whether the solution remains useful after launch</td></tr><tr><td>Can it scale safely?</td><td>Speed, uptime, security controls, monitoring, and regional hosting needs</td><td>Protects the experience as usage and product data grow</td></tr><tr><td>Is it accessible?</td><td>Keyboard use, contrast, focus, labels, text alternatives, and testing</td><td>Enables more people to complete the journey</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is the Future of Web-Based Product Configuration?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The future of web-based product configuration is more conversational, visual, connected, and automated. Artificial intelligence will help people describe their needs, 3D and augmented reality will make products easier to judge, and composable technology will connect configuration directly with commerce, production, and service.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">AI-powered guided selling</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI can turn everyday requests such as “I need a quiet machine for a small workshop” into useful questions and recommendations. Product rules must still verify the answer so that a friendly suggestion never becomes an impossible order.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Advanced 3D and augmented reality</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Faster devices and better web graphics will make detailed models easier to use without downloads. AR will help more buyers check scale, placement, and appearance in a real environment before committing.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Composable and headless architecture</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Composable systems are built from connected parts that can be changed independently. A headless configurator separates its underlying logic from the visible interface, making it easier to reuse the same capabilities across websites, apps, portals, and stores.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Automated sales-to-manufacturing workflows </h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Validated choices can increasingly create engineering data, bills of materials, work instructions, and service records. Human review will remain necessary for unusual or safety-critical orders, but routine handovers can become much faster.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Choose CanvasLogic for Web-Based Product Configuration?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The platform supports interactive 3D, browser-based augmented reality, real-time pricing, PDF quotes, mobile use, and embedding through an iFrame or API. Data can also move into ecommerce, CRM, ERP, or manufacturing environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic provides solutions for manufacturing, furniture, automotive, medical equipment, and building products. Each project begins by understanding the product, users, rules, systems, and expected result.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This combination is particularly useful when a company needs more than an attractive product viewer. Buyers can see what they are creating, the system can confirm that the design is valid, and the commercial process can continue with an accurate price or quote.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Conclusion</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A web-based product configurator turns a complicated decision into understandable steps. It helps buyers explore, visualize, and price their choices while giving the business cleaner data and control over what can be sold.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best solution represents the product faithfully, explains choices clearly, connects with existing systems, and remains manageable as the product range changes. A focused use case and reliable data provide the strongest starting point.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">FAQ</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Can a web-based product configurator work offline?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Usually, a web-based configurator needs an internet connection because its models, rules, prices, product variants, rendering, and integrations run online. Limited offline use is possible, but the required data and assets must be stored safely on the device and synchronized when the connection returns.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">How often should configuration rules and catalogs be updated?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Update them whenever a product, price, component, regulation, or compatibility rule changes. Many businesses also schedule regular reviews, assign an owner to each data area, and use automated tests to check popular and high-risk combinations before publishing updates.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Which accessibility standard should a configurator follow?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">WCAG 2.2 is the current W3C recommendation for making web content more accessible. Aim for the level required by applicable laws or contracts, commonly Level AA, and test with keyboards, screen readers, zoom, visible focus, and alternatives to visual-only information.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Which metrics should businesses track after launching a configurator?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Track configuration starts and completions, time to quote, quote accuracy, conversion rate, average order value, abandonment points, sales-cycle length, error or return rates, and the share of orders requiring manual correction. Compare the results with a clear baseline from before launch.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is the Difference Between an RFQ and CPQ?</title>
		<link>https://canvaslogic.com/cpq-and-rfq/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Sheardown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 12:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canvaslogic.com/?p=2761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This article explains how RFQ and CPQ differ in purpose, ownership, workflows, benefits, and limitations, as well as how they can work together. By the end, you will be able to decide whether your business needs an RFQ, CPQ, or both.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-7387b849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<div class="wp-block-group has-gray-background-color has-background is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Key Facts</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>RFQ means request for quotation.</strong> A buyer sends requirements to one or more vendors and asks each vendor to submit a quotation or bid.</li>



<li><strong>CPQ means configure, price, quote.</strong> A seller uses product, pricing, and approval rules to build a valid offer.</li>



<li><strong>An RFQ creates competition between suppliers.</strong> CPQ creates consistency inside the selling organization.</li>



<li><strong>RFQ and CPQ are complementary.</strong> An RFQ can provide the customer requirements that start a CPQ workflow.</li>
</ul>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">RFQ and CPQ both shape how B2B companies create and evaluate quotes, but they serve different users and stages of the commercial process. An RFQ helps buyers request and compare offers from vendors, while <a href="/cpq-software/">CPQ</a> helps sellers configure complex products, apply accurate pricing, and generate professional quotes. This article explains how RFQ and CPQ differ in purpose, ownership, workflows, benefits, and limitations, as well as how they can work together. By the end, you will be able to decide whether your business needs an RFQ, CPQ, or both. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is CPQ?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ is software that helps businesses configure products or services, apply accurate pricing rules, and generate customer-ready quotes.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Configure, Price, and Quote explained</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Configure, Price, and Quote are three connected jobs. Configure selects a valid combination of products, features, or services. Price applies lists, agreements, discounts, margins, currencies, and other rules. Quote turns the result into a customer-ready document or digital proposal.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For an industrial door, a customer may choose the size, material, motor, sensors, finish, and installation. Configure, Price, Quote can block an undersized motor, add installation, apply an approved discount, and generate the quote. The resulting offer is both sellable and technically possible.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">How CPQ software works</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Configure, Price, Quote combines customer needs with data and business rules. A representative or self-service buyer selects requirements; the system checks compatibility, calculates pricing, and routes exceptions for approval. Approved details then appear in a quotation, proposal, or order.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CRM integration can supply customer data, PIM can supply product information, and ERP can supply prices, costs, or order details.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">When businesses use CPQ solutions</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses use Configure, Price, Quote when a normal price list cannot produce a reliable offer. Typical users include manufacturers, technology providers, equipment distributors, and service businesses with many packages or dependencies. CPQ is especially useful when a large catalog creates numerous possible combinations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If salespeople repeatedly ask engineering whether a product is buildable, ask finance about discounts, or copy prices between spreadsheets, Configure, Price, Quote can turn that knowledge into reusable rules. Teams then stop rebuilding the same answer for every deal.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="960" height="815" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/RFQ.webp" alt="RFQ - Request for quotation" class="wp-image-2763" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/RFQ.webp 960w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/RFQ-300x255.webp 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/RFQ-768x652.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px" /></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is the Main Difference Between an RFQ and CPQ?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The easiest way to understand the difference between an RFQ and CPQ is to look at who starts each process and why. For example, a factory that needs 100 customized machines may send an RFQ to several suppliers to compare their prices, delivery dates, and terms. Each supplier can then use CPQ software to select a valid machine configuration, calculate the correct price, apply discounts, and prepare its quote. In short, an RFQ helps a buyer compare offers, while Configure, Price, Quote helps a seller create one.&nbsp;</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Area</strong></td><td><strong>RFQ</strong></td><td><strong>CPQ</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Starting party</td><td>Buyer or procurement team</td><td>Seller, partner, or seller-managed self-service channel</td></tr><tr><td>Primary purpose</td><td>Request and compare vendor bids</td><td>Configure an offer, calculate pricing, and create a quote</td></tr><tr><td>Commercial side</td><td>Buy-side sourcing</td><td>Sell-side sales execution</td></tr><tr><td>Main input</td><td>Requirements, quantities, deadlines, and terms</td><td>Product catalog, configuration logic, price rules, and customer data</td></tr><tr><td>Main output</td><td>Supplier quotations for evaluation</td><td>Valid, priced, and formatted customer quote</td></tr><tr><td>Typical technology</td><td>Procurement, e-sourcing, or supplier portal</td><td>CPQ, CRM, ecommerce, PIM, and ERP ecosystem</td></tr><tr><td>Core control</td><td>Buyer controls the request and evaluation</td><td>Seller controls product and pricing rules</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Buyer-initiated vs. seller-driven processes</h3>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td>RFQ: buyer-initiated</td><td>CPQ: seller-driven</td></tr><tr><td>The buyer defines the need and invites vendors to respond.</td><td>The seller defines what can be sold and how each valid offer is priced.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An RFQ starts when a buyer has a clear requirement and wants market offers. CPQ starts when a seller turns requirements into a commercial solution. A customer may use the configurator directly, but the seller still controls its catalog, rules, prices, and approval limits.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Procurement document vs. sales technology</h3>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td>RFQ: procurement document</td><td>CPQ: sales technology</td></tr><tr><td>The RFQ records what the buyer wants vendors to price.</td><td>CPQ manages the logic used to build and price the seller’s response.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An RFQ is a procurement document and process step. <a href="https://help.sap.com/docs/SAP_S4HANA_ON-PREMISE/af9ef57f504840d2b81be8667206d485/737eb65334e6b54ce10000000a174cb4.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">SAP</a> defines it as an invitation for a vendor to bid on materials or services. CPQ is sales technology rather than a market request. Even when managed in software, the RFQ remains the buyer’s request.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Manual comparison vs. automated configuration</h3>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td>RFQ: comparison</td><td>CPQ: configuration automation</td></tr><tr><td>Procurement compares price, delivery, compliance, service, and other bid terms.</td><td>Rules automatically check options, calculate prices, and prepare the quote.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">RFQ evaluation can be digital, but the buyer still compares separate vendor responses. CPQ automation instead checks the seller’s proposed combination and applies its commercial rules. One process chooses among suppliers; the other creates one supplier’s reliable offer.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="960" height="815" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ.webp" alt="CPQ, Configure, Price, Quote" class="wp-image-2766" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ.webp 960w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-300x255.webp 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-768x652.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px" /></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Do RFQ and CPQ Processes Compare?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">RFQ and CPQ differ in process ownership, product configuration, pricing and discount management, quote generation and approval, typical users, and business outcomes. RFQ organizes buying and bidding; CPQ turns requirements into a controlled seller quote.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Process ownership</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The buyer owns RFQ requirements, vendor selection, deadlines, evaluation, and award decisions. The seller owns CPQ product models, price logic, templates, and approvals. Neither side directly controls the other’s rules.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Product configuration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An RFQ describes the required result, quantity, or service level; CPQ turns those requirements into a valid solution. An RFQ may request ten machines with a target output, while CPQ selects the model, motor, controls, accessories, and service package.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Pricing and discount management</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An RFQ asks vendors for prices and terms. CPQ applies rules for options, quantity, customer group, region, margin, and discounts. Exceptions can go to a manager instead of becoming uncontrolled spreadsheet edits.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Quote generation and approval</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each RFQ vendor submits a quotation by the buyer’s deadline. CPQ generates it after validating configuration and pricing. Standard deals can proceed automatically; unusual discounts, low margins, or special terms may need human approval.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Typical users</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">RFQ users include procurement teams, project owners, and responding vendors. CPQ users include salespeople, dealers, engineers, finance approvers, and self-service customers. Operations teams may maintain product rules.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Business outcomes</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An RFQ supports a transparent purchase decision. CPQ supports faster, consistent selling. The RFQ helps the buyer choose a vendor; CPQ helps the seller promise something deliverable at an approved price.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Do RFQ and CPQ Work Together?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">RFQ and CPQ connect customer requirements to product configuration, move from pricing rules to a final quote, and enable integration between procurement and sales workflows. The RFQ supplies structured demand; CPQ converts it into a valid seller response.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>From customer requirements to product configuration</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The seller maps RFQ requirements to products, options, and services. Clear items may enter CPQ as structured values; unusual ones need engineering review. The engine checks dependencies so that the response contains no impossible combinations.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">From pricing rules to a final quote</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ applies price and discount rules after validating the configuration. The quote can cover delivery, installation, service, warranty, assumptions, and validity. This traceable calculation strengthens the bid and explains what its price includes.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Integration between procurement and sales workflows</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integration reduces retyping between e-sourcing and sales systems. APIs, portals, structured spreadsheets, or document tools can move requirements into CRM or CPQ and return the response. Ambiguous specifications still need judgment, so automate repeatable data while keeping people responsible for promises.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Are the Benefits of RFQ and CPQ?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The benefits of RFQ and CPQ include clearer requirements and responses, more comparable bids, better traceability, faster revisions, and lower delivery risk.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Benefits of CPQ for sellers</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ helps sellers turn commercial knowledge into a repeatable process:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Faster quote preparation:</strong> reusable rules replace repeated catalog searches and spreadsheet calculations.</li>



<li><strong>Fewer configuration errors:</strong> compatibility rules block combinations that cannot be produced or delivered.</li>



<li><strong>Stronger pricing control:</strong> approved discounts and margin limits are applied consistently.</li>



<li><strong>Shorter approval paths:</strong> standard deals proceed quickly, while exceptions reach the correct reviewer.</li>



<li><strong>Easier sales training:</strong> guided selling helps newer representatives ask the right questions.</li>



<li><strong>Better customer experience:</strong> buyers receive clearer options, prices, and visual information sooner.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Shared benefits for complex B2B sales</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">RFQ and CPQ together improve the quality of the commercial exchange:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Clearer requirements and responses:</strong> the RFQ states the need, and CPQ structures the seller’s answer.</li>



<li><strong>More comparable bids:</strong> complete configurations reduce hidden assumptions in vendor quotations.</li>



<li><strong>Better traceability:</strong> teams can connect requirements, rules, prices, approvals, and final documents.</li>



<li><strong>Faster revisions:</strong> a changed quantity or option can flow through pricing without rebuilding the proposal.</li>



<li><strong>Lower delivery risk:</strong> validated configurations make it less likely that sales promise an unsuitable product.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Are the Limitations of RFQ and CPQ?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">RFQs may contain incomplete requirements, while CPQ can only automate knowledge encoded in its rules. Neither process guarantees a good decision.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Common CPQ challenges</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ projects can struggle when scope and ownership are unclear:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Complex product rules may take time to discover, document, test, and maintain.</li>



<li>Sales teams may resist the system if it adds steps without making quoting easier.</li>



<li>Too many approval levels can reproduce the delays CPQ was meant to remove.</li>



<li>Highly unusual deals may still require engineering, legal, or finance review.</li>



<li>Poorly designed quote templates can make correct data difficult for a buyer to understand.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Data and integration dependencies</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ results depend on the quality of connected data and systems:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Incorrect product data can allow invalid options or exclude valid ones.</li>



<li>Outdated price lists can create quotations that harm margin or customer trust.</li>



<li>Weak CRM, ERP, ecommerce, or PIM integration can create duplicate records and manual work.</li>



<li>Missing ownership makes rules and catalogs slowly become outdated.</li>



<li>Unclear RFQ data may require manual interpretation before configuration can begin.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When Should a Business Use an RFQ or CPQ?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A business should assess scenarios that benefit from CPQ, scenarios that require an RFQ, and scenarios where both are needed. Use Configure, Price, Quote to control complex offers, RFQ to compare bids, and both to turn a buying request into a valid sales response.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Scenarios that benefit from CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Choose CPQ for configurable products, many price rules, frequent quote errors, slow approvals, or guided self-service. A machine manufacturer with optional components and regional prices gains more than a shop with a few fixed-price items.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Scenarios that require an RFQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Choose an RFQ when the buyer knows their needs and wants comparable terms from qualified suppliers. Common cases include materials, standard equipment, logistics, and defined services. If solution design matters more than price, use an RFP to request an approach rather than only a quotation.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Scenarios where both are needed</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Use both when formal sourcing covers a complex solution. An airport may issue an RFQ for customized security gates with capacity and compliance requirements. Suppliers can use CPQ to configure valid gates, calculate pricing, secure approvals, and submit bids.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Can Businesses Choose Between RFQ and CPQ?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses can choose through questions for buyers, questions for sales organizations, and a final decision checklist. First, identify whether the problem is purchasing, creating controlled offers, or connecting both processes.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Questions for buyers</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Buyers should ask whether requirements are clear, whether they need several bids, and whether the stated criteria will decide the award. Define quantities, deadlines, service expectations, formats, and vendor questions. If suppliers might interpret the need differently, consider research or an RFP first.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Questions for sales organizations</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sales teams should ask where configuration errors occur, how long approvals take, and what knowledge lives only in employees’ heads. Identify the systems that own customer, product, cost, and order data. CPQ is justified when repeated complexity creates measurable delay, risk, or lost revenue.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Final decision checklist</h3>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Business situation</strong></td><td><strong>RFQ</strong></td><td><strong>CPQ</strong></td><td><strong>Both</strong></td></tr><tr><td>A buyer wants comparable bids from several vendors</td><td>✓</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>A seller must validate complex product options</td><td></td><td>✓</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Pricing depends on rules, discounts, or approvals</td><td></td><td>✓</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Procurement is sourcing a configurable solution</td><td></td><td></td><td>✓</td></tr><tr><td>A supplier must turn formal requirements into an accurate bid</td><td></td><td></td><td>✓</td></tr><tr><td>Products are fixed-price and purchased directly</td><td>Usually unnecessary</td><td>Usually unnecessary</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why choose CanvasLogic for CPQ solutions?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic suits companies that want complex products to be easier to understand and quote. It combines rule-based configuration with photorealistic <a href="/configuration-software/">3D visualization</a>, <a href="/ar-product-configurator/">augmented reality</a>, real-time pricing, guided selling, proposal creation, and automated order submission. Buyers and salespeople can see a product change while selecting options.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic works across websites, ecommerce, mobile, and point-of-sale experiences. Its integration capabilities connect configuration and visualization with CRM, ERP, and PIM data. Manufacturers, retailers, and distributors gain a visual CPQ experience that still enforces product rules.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Conclusion</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">RFQ helps buyers request and compare offers; Configure, Price, Quote helps sellers create valid, accurately priced offers. Choose according to who starts the process and whether supplier competition or product configuration is the main task. For complex B2B sales, RFQ can provide clear demand, and Configure, Price, Quote can turn it into a dependable response.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">FAQ</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">How much does a CPQ implementation typically cost?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A CPQ implementation can range from a low five-figure focused project to a six-figure or larger enterprise program. Licenses are only one cost: budget for product modeling, data cleaning, integration, testing, training, support, and rule maintenance. Compare total cost with current quote effort, errors, approval delays, and lost deals.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Can artificial intelligence</strong> <strong>automate RFQ responses?</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI can automate requirement extraction, document classification, content retrieval, first drafts, gap checks, and expert routing. It should not make unchecked commitments about price, compliance, delivery, or contracts. Combine AI for drafting, CPQ for controlled configuration and pricing, and people for final approval.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">How long does CPQ implementation take?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A focused Configure, Price, Quote implementation often takes three to six months; a deeply integrated enterprise rollout may take six to twelve months or longer. Data quality, integrations, rules, templates, and testing drive the schedule. Starting with one product family or channel can create value sooner.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Which CRM and ERP platforms support CPQ and RFQ integrations?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many solutions connect with Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics 365, SAP, Oracle, and other platforms through connectors, APIs, middleware, or custom services. Verify the product edition, data objects, synchronization, authentication, and error handling. The real test is whether the connection supports the complete quote, procurement, and order workflow.&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best CPQ Software for Enterprise in 2026: Top Platforms Compared</title>
		<link>https://canvaslogic.com/best-cpq-software-for-enterprise/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Sheardown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canvaslogic.com/?p=2750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Searching for the best CPQ for large enterprise sales begins with one question: where does commercial complexity live? It may sit in engineering, negotiated pricing, subscriptions, governance, or multichannel commerce. Name that source before building a shortlist.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-7387b849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<div class="wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group has-gray-background-color has-background is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Key Facts</strong></h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The strongest enterprise CPQ is the one that matches product complexity, revenue model, sales channels, and existing business systems; there is no universal winner.</li>



<li>Manufacturing companies should prioritize rules-based configuration, BOM-ready outputs, and ERP, PLM, and CAD connections, while subscription businesses need amendments, renewals, ramp deals, and usage-based pricing.</li>



<li>Visual configuration is a commercial capability, not decoration: it helps customers understand complex products before a quote reaches engineering or production.</li>



<li>A proof of concept should test a difficult real quote, approval route, and downstream order handoff—not a polished vendor demo built around ideal data.</li>
</ul>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Large companies rarely struggle because salespeople cannot create a quote. They struggle because thousands of product options, price lists, discount policies, channels, and approvals must produce one offer that sales, finance, engineering, and the customer can trust. The best CPQ software for enterprise turns that complexity into a guided path without making every unusual deal an IT project.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Searching for the best CPQ for large enterprise sales begins with one question: where does commercial complexity live? It may sit in engineering, negotiated pricing, subscriptions, governance, or multichannel commerce. Name that source before building a shortlist.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is Enterprise CPQ Software?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise Configure, Price, Quote software configures valid products or services, calculates the correct price, and produces approved quotes at scale. Unlike a proposal tool, enterprise CPQ codifies compatibility rules, discounts, currencies, contract terms, and approval workflows across markets. It can block an incompatible component, route a low-margin deal to finance, and pass the order to ERP without rekeying. The result is a repeatable process with fewer errors.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise CPQ also connects sales to delivery. CRM supplies the opportunity, ERP supplies operational data, PLM or CAD supplies product logic, and billing manages recurring charges. When integration works, sales promises match what the company can build and invoice. Evaluate CPQ as revenue infrastructure, not an isolated application.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Best Enterprise CPQ Software at a Glance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best enterprise CPQ software options include CanvasLogic, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, SAP CPQ, Oracle CPQ, Conga CPQ, Tacton CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, and others. The following comparison highlights each platform’s clearest fit rather than declaring one product superior in every situation. Product names, packaging, and roadmaps can change, so enterprises should confirm current capabilities during procurement.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Platform</strong></td><td><strong>Best fit</strong></td><td><strong>Standout strength</strong></td><td><strong>Ecosystem or channel fit</strong></td><td><strong>Point to validate</strong></td></tr><tr><td>CanvasLogic</td><td>Configurable manufactured products</td><td>Real-time 3D and AR visualization</td><td>Web, ecommerce, CRM, ERP, PLM</td><td>Depth of rules and integrations for the specific product model</td></tr><tr><td>Salesforce Revenue Cloud</td><td>Salesforce-centered revenue operations</td><td>Native quote-to-cash continuity</td><td>Salesforce CRM and partner ecosystem</td><td>Reimplementation scope for legacy Salesforce CPQ users</td></tr><tr><td>SAP CPQ</td><td>SAP-led enterprises</td><td>Connection with SAP sales and ERP processes</td><td>SAP S/4HANA, CRM, and commerce</td><td>Required integration architecture and product modeling effort</td></tr><tr><td>Oracle CPQ</td><td>Oracle enterprise suites</td><td>Broad lead-to-cash alignment</td><td>Oracle Fusion, Commerce, and Subscription Management</td><td>Fit outside an Oracle-centered stack</td></tr><tr><td>Conga CPQ</td><td>High-volume, complex quoting</td><td>Large quotes, documents, contracts, and pricing</td><td>Salesforce, Dynamics, SAP</td><td>Which Conga CPQ product line best matches the use case</td></tr><tr><td>Tacton CPQ</td><td>Engineer-to-order manufacturing</td><td>Constraint-based configuration</td><td>ERP, PLM, CAD, PIM</td><td>Model governance and implementation resources</td></tr><tr><td>PROS Smart CPQ</td><td>Pricing-led B2B selling</td><td>AI-supported price optimization</td><td>CRM- and ERP-agnostic environments</td><td>Roadmap following the 2026 Conga acquisition</td></tr><tr><td>DealHub</td><td>SaaS and recurring revenue</td><td>Unified CPQ, contracts, billing, and subscriptions</td><td>Salesforce and HubSpot</td><td>Depth for highly engineered products</td></tr><tr><td>Experlogix CPQ</td><td>Complex products in CRM/ERP workflows</td><td>Industrial rules plus document automation</td><td>Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Salesforce</td><td>Global scale and localization requirements</td></tr><tr><td>Epicor CPQ</td><td>Visual make-to-order sales</td><td>2D, 3D, and AR configuration</td><td>Manufacturing and digital commerce</td><td>Fit with non-Epicor back-office systems</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is the Best CPQ Software for Enterprise in 2026?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best platform depends on whether the hardest problem is visual selling, engineering logic, subscription management, price optimization, or ecosystem alignment. Each option below deserves consideration for a distinct reason.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">CanvasLogic</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic is a strong choice when customers need to see a product while configuring it. CanvasLogic combines guided configuration, real-time <a href="/configuration-software/">3D</a> or <a href="/ar-product-configurator/">AR</a> visualization, pricing, and quoting with connections to web stores, CRM, ERP, and PLM. CanvasLogic integrates seamlessly with <a href="/magento-product-configurator/">Magento</a>, <a href="/3d-visual-configurator-and-cpq-for-sitecore/">Sitecore</a>, <a href="/cpq-software-for-hubspot/">HubSpot</a>, and others. Manufacturers should shortlist CanvasLogic when visual understanding drives conversion and order accuracy.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Salesforce Revenue Cloud</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce Revenue Cloud fits companies that want quoting inside a Salesforce-centered revenue process. The platform spans catalogs, configuration, pricing, contracts, orders, billing, and subscriptions; public US pricing lists Growth at $150 and Advanced at $200 per user monthly, billed annually. That breadth can reduce handoffs. Existing Salesforce CPQ customers should assess reimplementation rather than assume a simple upgrade.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">SAP CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SAP CPQ fits enterprises that depend on SAP data and processes. SAP supports complex configuration, optimized pricing, proposals, and CRM, ecommerce, and ERP connections; documented scenarios link SAP CPQ Quote 2.0 with SAP S/4HANA sales orders. That alignment keeps quotes close to master data. SAP manufacturers should test the full quote-to-order path.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Oracle CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle CPQ is most compelling when Oracle anchors sales, commerce, fulfillment, or finance. Oracle connects CPQ with Fusion Sales, Commerce, Order Management, and Subscription Management; documented scenarios cover recurring pricing, add-ons, renewals, and usage charges. An Oracle-led enterprise can gain continuity. A mixed-stack company should verify every non-Oracle connection.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Conga CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Conga CPQ suits complex catalogs, large quotes, and contract-heavy sales. Conga states that Smart CPQ can manage more than 10,000 line items with sub-second performance and quote across Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics, and SAP. Its portfolio also connects pricing, documents, and contracts. Enterprises with “mega-quotes” should test those claims using their own rules and line structure.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Tacton CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tacton CPQ is built for manufacturers with product rules too complex to memorize. Tacton emphasizes constraint-based configuration, guided selling, BOM generation, visualization, and ERP, PLM, CAD, PIM, and CRM integrations. These capabilities validate manufacturability before a promise reaches the factory. Engineer-to-order companies should evaluate Tacton with sales, engineering, and operations together.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">PROS Smart CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">PROS Smart CPQ remains relevant when pricing science sits at the center of B2B sales. It combines constraint-based configuration, high-volume quoting, and account-specific price guidance across CRM and ERP. Conga completed its acquisition of PROS B2B on February 2, 2026, bringing these capabilities into its portfolio. Buyers should request a written roadmap, support model, and migration policy.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">DealHub</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DealHub fits recurring-revenue companies that want CPQ, contracts, billing, and subscription management in one workspace. It supports pricing rules, approvals, guided selling, renewals, and Salesforce and HubSpot integrations. This reduces the tools needed for a routine SaaS deal. Test amendments, co-termination, ramp pricing, usage charges, and renewals across a full customer lifecycle.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Experlogix CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Experlogix CPQ fits enterprises needing industrial rules and rich proposals inside familiar systems. It covers complex configuration, discounts, approvals, governance, BOM and ERP handoff, 2D/3D visualization, and document automation. Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Salesforce integrations are central strengths. Buyers should validate bidirectional data flow with their exact CRM and ERP versions.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Epicor CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Epicor CPQ is a strong visual-selling option for make-to-order products. It provides 2D, 3D, and augmented-reality configuration and can generate BOMs from an accepted design. A Graceland Portable Buildings story links its 3D models with configuration-driven BOM generation. Sellers of modular or personalized products should test whether visual models produce production-ready data.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="768" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-Software-for-Enterprise-1024x768.webp" alt="A woman is configuring a sofa via her smartphone and with AR she can see how a sofa would look like in real life" class="wp-image-2753" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-Software-for-Enterprise-1024x768.webp 1024w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-Software-for-Enterprise-300x225.webp 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-Software-for-Enterprise-768x576.webp 768w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-Software-for-Enterprise-1536x1152.webp 1536w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/CPQ-Software-for-Enterprise.webp 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Which Enterprise CPQ Platform Fits Your Use Case?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best enterprise Configure, Price, Quote platform depends on your primary use case: Tacton, Experlogix, SAP CPQ, Conga, and Epicor suit complex manufacturing; CanvasLogic and Epicor excel in visual configuration; Salesforce Revenue Cloud and SAP CPQ align closely with their respective ecosystems; and Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Oracle CPQ, DealHub, and Conga support subscription sales. The final choice should prove your hardest configuration, pricing, integration, and multichannel scenarios with minimal customization.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Complex manufacturing</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tacton, Experlogix, SAP CPQ, Conga Smart CPQ, and Epicor CPQ deserve attention when sales choices must respect engineering constraints. The proof is whether a valid configuration generates the correct BOM or order without repair. Test the hardest product family first.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Visual and 3D configuration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic and Epicor CPQ stand out when seeing the product helps buyers decide, while Tacton and Experlogix also provide visualization. A real-time model should update choices, price, and validity together. Ask the vendor to configure one genuine product live.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Salesforce ecosystems</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce Revenue Cloud offers the closest native alignment, while Conga, Experlogix, and DealHub add specialized depth. Native data does not guarantee smooth ERP-driven availability or cost. Compare the full opportunity-to-order workflow, not only the quote screen.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">SAP ecosystems</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SAP CPQ is the starting point for SAP-centered organizations because SAP documents connections to S/4HANA sales processes. CanvasLogic, Tacton, or Conga may fit better when visual or engineering needs dominate. Minimize duplication of product and pricing rules.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Subscription sales</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Oracle CPQ with Subscription Management, DealHub, and Conga are credible recurring-revenue candidates. Each should prove amendments, renewals, ramp deals, usage pricing, and billing handoff with realistic contracts. A new-business quote alone is not enough.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Multichannel sales</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic, SAP CPQ, Oracle CPQ, Tacton, Epicor CPQ, and Conga support direct, partner, ecommerce, and self-service sales. The requirement is one governed configuration and pricing logic across channels. Confirm that dealers, customers, and salespeople receive consistent results.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Are the Key Features of Enterprise CPQ?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The key features of enterprise Configure, Price, Quote software are guided selling and product configuration, dynamic pricing and approvals, quote and proposal automation, CRM, ERP, PLM, CAD integrations, self-service, and omnichannel sales.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Guided selling and product configuration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Guided selling translates expert product knowledge into questions that a salesperson or buyer can answer. Rules then allow, require, or exclude options, preventing impossible combinations before engineering review. A useful demonstration should include dependencies, bundles, regional availability, and an exception. The result should be a valid, explainable configuration rather than merely a completed form.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Dynamic pricing and approvals</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dynamic pricing applies the right price list, discount, currency, agreement, and margin threshold. Automated approvals route exceptions without email, while analytics reveal discount and profitability patterns. This creates governance without making finance inspect every standard quote. Test both a normal and a deliberately unprofitable deal.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Quote and proposal automation</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Quote automation turns approved configuration and pricing data into consistent customer documents. Strong platforms can generate branded proposals, technical schedules, terms, and localized content without copying values between templates. This reduces rework and prevents a polished PDF from disagreeing with the underlying order. Evaluate document changes as carefully as quote creation.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">CRM, ERP, PLM, and CAD integration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integration keeps customer, commercial, engineering, and operational data synchronized. CRM should own the opportunity, ERP should supply order and financial data, and PLM or CAD should provide authoritative product information where needed. A successful <a href="/cpq-software/">CPQ</a> implementation defines ownership for every field and rule. Ask vendors to map data direction, timing, error handling, and recovery before estimating effort.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Self-service and omnichannel sales</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Self-service CPQ lets customers or partners configure and request a quote without surrendering commercial control. The same rules can power a website, dealer portal, sales desk, and commerce experience while permissions limit sensitive prices and options. This extends selling capacity without creating an unmanaged shadow catalog. Enterprises should test identity, entitlements, saved configurations, and assisted handoff.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How to Choose the Right Enterprise CPQ Platform</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Choose the right enterprise CPQ platform by defining your highest-impact business and product requirements, testing integrations and scalability with production-like data, comparing three-year total cost, and running a proof of concept with a difficult real-world deal. These four steps reveal which solution fits your processes with the least risk and unnecessary customization.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Define business and product requirements</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Start with the deals that are slow, risky, or expensive today. Document product rules, pricing models, quote volumes, regions, roles, approval thresholds, outputs, and exception paths, then rank each requirement by business impact. This exposes whether the project is mainly about configuration, pricing, subscriptions, visualization, or workflow automation. Build the shortlist around that dominant need.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Evaluate integrations and scalability</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Evaluate scalability as more than concurrent users. Enterprise CPQ must handle catalog size, rule complexity, quote line counts, currencies, languages, business units, channels, and integration traffic while preserving acceptable response times. Use production-like data to test the largest quote and busiest workflow. Request measurable performance targets and ownership for failed transactions.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Compare implementation costs</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Compare the total cost rather than the subscription price alone. A credible estimate includes licenses, product modeling, data cleansing, integrations, document templates, customization, testing, training, support, and internal subject-matter experts. Salesforce’s public prices are useful reference points, but most enterprise vendors quote individually because scope drives cost. Ask every finalist to price the same defined scenario over three years.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Run a proof of concept</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Run a proof of concept with one difficult, representative deal. Give each vendor the same source data and require configuration, pricing, approval, proposal generation, and ERP or billing handoff. Score completion time, user clarity, administrative effort, performance, and exception handling. A short proof with honest data reveals more than dozens of scripted slides.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Final Verdict</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best enterprise Configure, Price, Quote platform is the one that simplifies your hardest commercial decision while fitting the systems that already run the business. CanvasLogic is particularly persuasive for visual configuration; Tacton and Experlogix for engineered products; Salesforce, SAP, and Oracle for ecosystem alignment; DealHub for subscription workflows; Conga for large-scale quoting and contracts; PROS Smart CPQ for pricing-led use cases; and Epicor CPQ for visual make-to-order sales. Shortlist by use case, then let a proof of concept decide.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">FAQ</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Can enterprise CPQ software operate in offline environments?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise CPQ can operate offline only when the chosen architecture and vendor explicitly support local or disconnected use. On-premises deployment may keep a central system available inside a plant without public internet, but a traveling user still needs an offline client or synchronized local data. Offline access also creates version and conflict risks for prices and rules. Confirm exactly which functions work disconnected and how changes reconcile before treating offline support as proven.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">How often should enterprise CPQ pricing and configuration rules be audited?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise CPQ rules should receive scheduled quarterly reviews plus event-driven checks after product, cost, regulatory, or policy changes. High-volatility pricing may need weekly or automated monitoring, while stable engineering constraints can follow product-release governance. Audit logs should identify the owner, approver, effective date, affected quotes, and test result for each change. Set review frequency by business risk rather than applying one calendar to every rule.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Can enterprises use one CPQ platform across multiple business units?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises can use one Configure, Price, Quote platform across multiple business units when the platform separates shared standards from local variation. A scalable design can reuse core product logic and governance while allowing different catalogs, currencies, languages, approval limits, brands, and document templates. The proof is whether local teams can change permitted elements without breaking global rules. Establish ownership and release processes before consolidating every unit onto one instance.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best AI CPQ Software in 2026: Complete Guide to Intelligent Quote-to-Cash Platforms</title>
		<link>https://canvaslogic.com/best-ai-cpq-software/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Sheardown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canvaslogic.com/?p=2688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Key Facts: CPQ used to feel like a back-office calculator with a logo on it. Today, the category is far more interesting because it sits at the moment where commercial intent becomes operational reality: the product catalog is selected, pricing logic is enforced, discounts are governed, a quote and proposal are created, and downstream contracts, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-7387b849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<div class="wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group has-gray-background-color has-background is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Key Facts:</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>AI CPQ has evolved from a quoting tool into intelligent revenue infrastructure that connects configuration, pricing, approvals, contracts, billing, and renewals.</li>



<li>The most valuable AI capabilities include predictive configuration, dynamic pricing, generative quote creation, conversational assistance, and automated approvals.</li>



<li>AI-powered CPQ can shorten quote-to-cash cycles, improve quote accuracy, protect margins, enhance the buyer experience, and reduce sales onboarding time.</li>



<li>No single platform is best for every company; the right choice depends on the organization’s industry, revenue model, product complexity, sales channels, and operational requirements.</li>



<li>Conga is particularly strong for enterprise manufacturing, Subskribe for SaaS, DealHub for mid-market businesses, Nue for complex pricing, Mobileforce for field sales, and CanvasLogic for visual product configuration.</li>



<li>Companies should evaluate CPQ platforms based on measurable revenue goals, product complexity, pricing requirements, integration needs, and the practical maturity of their AI features.</li>
</ul>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ used to feel like a back-office calculator with a logo on it. Today, the category is far more interesting because it sits at the moment where commercial intent becomes operational reality: the product catalog is selected, pricing logic is enforced, discounts are governed, a quote and proposal are created, and downstream contracts, billing, and revenue recognition often start from the same data model.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That shift explains why evaluating AI CPQ software is really a revenue-design decision, not just a sales-tech purchase. The strongest tools now support recurring, usage-based, and hybrid subscription models; they also reduce handoffs between sales, RevOps, finance, and legal, which makes quoting faster and forecasting cleaner.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It also explains why the market feels newly urgent. Salesforce’s legacy Salesforce CPQ is now end of sale for new customers, and the company’s investment has shifted toward Revenue Cloud Advanced within Agentforce Revenue Management. In parallel, Deloitte reports that digitally mature B2B suppliers outperform lower-maturity peers on annual sales goals, and Salesforce says reps still lose most of their week to non-selling work.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Best AI CPQ Software Became a Strategic Priority in 2026</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI CPQ became strategic in 2026 because the old problem was never just manual quoting. The real problem was that pricing, approval, buyer communication, order capture, and revenue operations were spread across too many systems for too long.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is AI-Powered CPQ</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-powered CPQ software uses AI to assist or automate configuration, pricing, quoting, approvals, and related revenue decisions inside a governed commercial workflow. Salesforce frames CPQ as part of a unified quote-to-cash lifecycle; Oracle has added generative and agentic features directly inside CPQ, and Nue describes its approach as an agentic revenue architecture where AI builds pricing and runs quotes with finance guardrails.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Predictive product configuration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Predictive product configuration matters because sellers increasingly need help navigating compatibility, bundles, and complex solution design without escalating every deal to engineering. Oracle’s guided Configuration AI-Assist Agent captures natural-language requirements and proposes best-fit selections, while CanvasLogic uses guided selling and rules to narrow options for complex products.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Dynamic pricing recommendations</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dynamic pricing recommendations matter because modern B2B deals rarely fit a static price list. Conga synchronizes AI-driven pricing recommendations into the quoting workflow; Mobileforce says its AI pricing engine analyzes market conditions and customer history; and Oracle’s Deal Pricing AI-Assist can translate a target total discount or contract value into line-level pricing actions.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Generative quote creation</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Generative quote creation turns a traditionally tedious task into a guided commercial draft. Salesforce says Agentforce can instantly generate personalized customer quotes and summarize them, while Oracle CPQ supports generative quote summaries for internal and customer-facing communication. PandaDoc plays at the same layer through automated quote assembly tied to templates, product data, and signature workflow.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Conversational sales assistance</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Conversational sales assistance is becoming the most visible face of AI-powered CPQ software because it lets non-experts ask for a quote the way they would ask a colleague for help. Oracle’s Quote Assistance Agent answers questions in natural language and can now handle more verbose prompts, while Nue lets teams describe a ramp, discount, or usage tier in plain language and compile it into executable pricing logic.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Automated approval intelligence</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Automated approval intelligence matters because margin is usually lost in exceptions, not in standard deals. Salesforce embeds discounting rules and automated approvals into quoting, DealHub emphasizes automated and parallel approval workflow support, and Subskribe lets teams design approval flows based on deal size, payment terms, and discount conditions.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Are the Core Benefits of the Best AI CPQ Software?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best AI-powered CPQ solutions do not merely speed up quotes. The benefits are the following: faster quote-to-cash cycles, higher quote accuracy, improved margin protection, better buyer experience, and reduced sales onboarding time.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Faster quote-to-cash cycles</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Faster quote-to-cash cycles are the first visible win because AI and automation remove repetitive work from the quoting path. Salesforce positions Revenue Cloud as a complete quote-to-cash platform, DealHub highlights faster time-to-value and quote creation in minutes, and PandaDoc focuses on seamless quoting, approval, and signature from inside the CRM.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Higher quote accuracy</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Higher quote accuracy comes from governed logic, not just nicer UI. Salesforce, Oracle, DealHub, and CanvasLogic all center their value story on valid configuration, automated pricing rules, and reduced misquotes, while Conga explicitly frames its CPQ around accurate, margin-protected quotes for complex product mixes.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Improved margin protection</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Improved margin protection is where AI CPQ earns executive attention. Conga talks about profit-first precision, DealHub about built-in guardrails and smart discounting, and Mobileforce about margin protection controls inside its pricing engine. That combination turns pricing from a spreadsheet habit into a policy-enforced system.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Better buyer experience</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Better buyer experience sounds soft, but it is increasingly hard revenue infrastructure. Deloitte notes that B2B buyers now expect digitized experiences, PandaDoc stresses impressive, automated quotes, and CanvasLogic differentiates by making product buying visual and interactive rather than abstract and error-prone.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Reduced sales onboarding time</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reduced sales onboarding time is one of the least glamorous but most durable benefits. If pricing knowledge lives in the system instead of in one heroic sales engineer, ramp time falls. Nue markets plain-language summaries that let admins understand rules without deep CPQ expertise, DealHub emphasizes intuitive workflows for seller adoption, and Subskribe says teams can start using its CPQ with virtually no user training.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="959" height="540" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/AI-CPQ.webp" alt="Kitchen configurator on the computer screen." class="wp-image-2690" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/AI-CPQ.webp 959w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/AI-CPQ-300x169.webp 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/AI-CPQ-768x432.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 959px) 100vw, 959px" /></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Are the Top AI CPQ Software Platforms in 2026?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best AI CPQ platforms in 2026 are the following: Salesforce Revenue Cloud and Agentforce, DealHub CPQ, Oracle CPQ, Conga CPQ, PandaDoc CPQ, Mobileforce CPQ, CanvasLogic, Nue, and Subskribe.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Salesforce Revenue Cloud and Agentforce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce is the safest shortlist choice for companies already standardized on Salesforce CRM and looking for a broad quote-to-cash platform. Revenue Cloud Growth starts at $150 per user per month and Advanced at $200 per user per month billed annually, while Agentforce pricing is layered separately through add-ons, licenses, flex credits, or conversation pricing. The strongest pros are native ecosystem fit, structured configuration, broad revenue-lifecycle scope, and visible AI roadmap; the trade-offs are cost, architectural breadth, and the reality that legacy Salesforce CPQ is now end of sale for new customers.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">DealHub CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DealHub is one of the most convincing mid-market options because it combines CPQ, buyer collaboration, subscription logic, and revenue operations framing without looking like a heavyweight enterprise suite. Its pros are guided quote configuration, adaptive pricebooks, automated approvals, partner quoting, strong CRM integrations, and a no-code deployment message; the main cons are less transparent pricing and a lighter public AI story than the most AI-native entrants. Pricing is custom.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Oracle CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle remains a serious choice for companies that need deep control and enterprise process rigor. Oracle CPQ covers opportunity-to-quote-to-order processes, and recent releases added generative quote summaries, quote assistance, guided configuration AI, deal-pricing AI, and AI-generated rule descriptions. Its pros are depth, rapid AI feature expansion, and strong fit for complex environments; its cons are a steeper implementation profile and less consumer-friendly pricing transparency, although Oracle’s U.S. public-sector price list shows $240 per hosted named user for Fusion CPQ.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Conga CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Conga earns its place because it is unusually strong where product complexity and commercial scale collide. The company positions Smart CPQ for manufacturers and distributors, supports 100,000-plus line items, integrates pricing, quoting, and contracts, and layers AI-driven pricing insight on top. The pros are CRM-agnostic flexibility, manufacturing strength, and margin governance; the cons are custom pricing and a platform breadth that may feel heavier than necessary for simpler teams.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">PandaDoc CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">PandaDoc is the most approachable option in this list for organizations that care as much about getting polished quotes signed as they do about deep enterprise pricing logic. The pros are fast adoption, strong document and e-signature capabilities, approval workflow, deal rooms, and public entry pricing; the cons are that it is not positioned as the deepest industrial or multi-entity revenue engine. Public pricing shows CPQ document fees starting around $2 to $3.50 per document depending on plan structure, while Enterprise seat pricing is custom.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Mobileforce CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mobileforce deserves more attention than it usually gets because it is one of the clearest answers for field-heavy selling. The platform markets AI-driven pricing, customer-tier discounting, competitive price analysis, and offline quote-plus-CRM operation. The pros are mobile-first design, field execution, public entry pricing, and fast access for distributed sales motions; the cons are a smaller ecosystem than the category giants and less evidence of broad enterprise standardization. Public pricing lists an Enterprise plan at $65 per user per month paid annually.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">CanvasLogic</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic is different in a useful way. It mixes CPQ with <a href="/configuration-software/">3D</a> and <a href="/ar-product-configurator/">AR</a> visualization, which makes it compelling when seeing the configured product is part of the purchasing decision, not a cosmetic extra. Its pros are visual selling, guided questionnaires, dynamic pricing, automated proposal output, and strong manufacturing and custom-product storytelling; the cons are demo-only pricing and a narrower fit for businesses that do not need visual commerce. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Nue</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nue is one of the most interesting newer-generation platforms because it treats pricing logic itself as an AI surface. It lets teams describe rules in plain language, builds and audits that logic, and runs quotes from one data model across CPQ, billing, and lifecycle management. The pros are hybrid pricing support, AI-native rule management, and finance guardrails; the cons are custom pricing and a more focused market footprint than Salesforce or Oracle.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Subskribe</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Subskribe is one of the strongest purpose-built platforms for recurring-revenue companies. It supports recurring, one-time, usage-based, and ramp pricing; it also connects quoting to billing and revenue recognition in the same quote-to-revenue model. The pros are speed, SaaS-native packaging, strong approvals, and finance alignment; the cons are a primary focus on modern SaaS rather than every industry under the sun, plus custom pricing rather than a simple public rate card.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>AI CPQ feature</strong></td><td><strong>What it does</strong></td><td><strong>Primary business impact</strong></td><td><strong>Platforms with relevant capabilities</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Natural language quote generation</td><td>Converts plain-language deal requirements into structured quotes, summaries, or pricing rules</td><td>Reduces administrative work and makes CPQ easier for sellers to adopt</td><td>Salesforce, Oracle, Nue</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue forecasting intelligence</td><td>Uses structured quote, pipeline, and financial data to improve revenue visibility</td><td>Produces cleaner forecasts and more reliable sales planning</td><td>Salesforce, DealHub</td></tr><tr><td>Real-time discount guidance</td><td>Recommends or controls discounts based on deal context, customer history, and pricing rules</td><td>Protects margins while allowing sales teams to respond quickly</td><td>Conga, Oracle, DealHub, Mobileforce</td></tr><tr><td>Cross-sell and upsell recommendations</td><td>Suggests compatible products, bundles, upgrades, or expansion opportunities during configuration</td><td>Increases average deal value and supports more</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Comparative Analysis of Leading AI CPQ Vendors</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The smartest way to compare vendors is not by counting features. It is by matching commercial complexity to operational style. A company selling configurable medical equipment through dealers needs something very different from a SaaS firm selling usage credits, and both need something different from a field-service business quoting onsite.&nbsp;</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td>Buying situation</td><td>Best current fit</td><td>Why</td></tr><tr><td>Enterprise manufacturing</td><td>Conga Smart CPQ</td><td>Conga explicitly positions Smart CPQ for manufacturers and distributors, supports engineering logic, AI-driven pricing guidance, and 100,000-plus line items.&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>SaaS companies</td><td>Subskribe</td><td>Subskribe is purpose-built for subscription-first SaaS, supports ramps, amendments, usage billing, and unified quote-to-revenue reporting.&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Mid-market businesses</td><td>DealHub CPQ</td><td>DealHub combines guided quoting, seller adoption, CRM flexibility, buyer collaboration, and no-code deployment.&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Complex pricing models</td><td>Nue</td><td>Nue’s strongest differentiator is AI-built pricing logic in plain language across discounts, ramps, term pricing, and usage tiers.&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Mobile sales teams</td><td>Mobileforce CPQ</td><td>Mobileforce explicitly supports offline quote generation and CRM updates for field teams, with mobile-first positioning.&nbsp;</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Best platform for enterprise manufacturing</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For enterprise manufacturing, the best platform is the one that can govern engineering constraints and commercial complexity at once. Conga and CanvasLogic are especially strong here, but Conga has the clearer enterprise-scale story for massive line-item quoting, complex industrial logic, and controlled margin governance.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Best option for SaaS companies</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For SaaS, the center of gravity has moved from quote generation to monetization design. Subskribe and Nue both understand ramps, usage, amendments, and hybrid packaging far better than legacy manufacturing-style CPQ models, with Subskribe having the more complete public quote-to-revenue story today.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Best choice for mid-market businesses</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For mid-market companies, elegance beats theoretical feature depth. DealHub is hard to ignore because it balances guided quoting, approvals, channel selling, and buyer-facing collaboration without demanding a full enterprise transformation on day one.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Best solution for complex pricing models</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For pure pricing complexity, Nue is the most forward-looking option in this list because it treats pricing design as a conversational and governable AI problem. Oracle is still the stronger traditional enterprise answer, but Nue is the more interesting architecture when pricing changes constantly. That is an inference based on each vendor’s official positioning and AI feature set.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Best platform for mobile sales teams</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For mobile and field sales, Mobileforce has the clearest product-market fit. Its offline support is not a side note; it is central to the platform story, which matters if reps quote at customer sites, events, or locations where connectivity is unreliable.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Which AI Features Matter Most in Modern CPQ Platforms?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not every AI feature is equally useful. The features that matter the most are natural language quote generation, revenue forecasting intelligence, real-time discount guidance, cross-sell and upsell recommendations, and contract risk detection.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Natural language quote generation</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Natural language quote generation matters because it compresses expertise into the interface. Salesforce uses Agentforce for quote creation and summarization, Oracle supports natural-language quote assistance and guided configuration, and Nue lets teams encode pricing in plain language. If a seller can describe the deal naturally and the system turns that into a compliant quote, adoption tends to rise.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Revenue forecasting intelligence</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Revenue forecasting intelligence matters because CPQ is where commercial intent first becomes structured data. Salesforce explains that revenue forecasting combines pipeline and financial inputs to predict performance, while DealHub highlights revenue intelligence and structured data capture around quotes. Put simply, clean quote data improves pipeline visibility and makes forecasting less political and more evidence-based.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Real-time discount guidance</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Real-time discount guidance is one of the highest-value AI features because it protects gross margin without freezing the sale. Conga provides pricing guidance and guardrails, DealHub pushes structured approvals and approval-aware pricing, Mobileforce uses customer and market context in its pricing engine, and Oracle’s deal-pricing agent can work backward from a target deal outcome.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Cross-sell and upsell recommendations</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cross-sell and upsell recommendations matter when <a href="/cpq-software/">CPQ</a> becomes a guided selling engine instead of a calculator. Conga says its AI agents can surface cross-sell opportunities during configuration, DealHub ties CPQ to renewals and expansion control, and Subskribe is built around upsell, cross-sell, amend, and renew motions. Good AI here should feel like relevant bundling, not random add-on spam. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Contract risk detection</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Contract risk detection matters because the commercial deal is not done when the number is approved; it is done when the agreement is executable and safe. Conga’s contract intelligence positioning focuses on AI-driven risk control, and DealHub’s contract AI materials emphasize flagging risky terms or missing clauses. That means modern CPQ increasingly works best when it is close to CLM rather than isolated from it.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Are the Industry-Specific Use Cases for AI CPQ?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI CPQ is most persuasive in the following industries: manufacturing and industrial equipment, medical devices and healthcare, telecommunications, software and SaaS, and automotive and mobility.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Manufacturing and industrial equipment</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Manufacturing teams need valid configurations, engineering logic, and often dealer-friendly selling paths. Conga and CanvasLogic both target this space directly, with Conga emphasizing scale and pricing precision while CanvasLogic adds visualization for complex custom products.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Medical devices and healthcare</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Medical-device sales are high stakes because technical accuracy and customer clarity both matter. CanvasLogic explicitly positions CPQ for medical device manufacturing, and Conga’s healthcare messaging emphasizes competitive quoting with compliance-conscious workflow support.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Telecommunications</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Telecommunications needs attribute-based pricing, complex contracts, eligibility rules, and omnichannel quoting. Salesforce’s Communications Cloud materials make that case directly, including support for context-sensitive pricing and industry CPQ.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Software and SaaS</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software and SaaS vendors need hybrid charging, credits, co-terming, upgrades, renewals, and usage-aware pricing. That is why Nue and Subskribe feel more natural in this segment than older hardware-first CPQ designs.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Automotive and mobility</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Automotive selling is configuration-heavy and rule-bound, especially once model variants, regional packages, and special-purpose vehicles enter the picture. CanvasLogic’s automotive CPQ content centers exactly on that problem.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How to Choose the Best AI CPQ Software</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Choosing CPQ well is mostly about refusing to buy on demo energy alone. The right platform should match your revenue model, your pricing volatility, your approval culture, and your downstream finance requirements.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Define revenue operations goals</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Define your revenue operations goals first because “better quotes” is too vague to buy software against. Decide whether your real target is faster quoting, tighter margin control, better quote-to-order conversion, cleaner renewal motions, less reconciliation, or stronger revenue predictability. Conga’s KPI guidance points to quote accuracy, response time, price realization, adoption rates, revenue from existing customers, and time to market for price changes as useful post-implementation measures.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Map product complexity</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Map product complexity honestly. If you sell industrial systems with engineering dependencies, you need something very different from a company selling a simple SaaS seat bundle. If you need visual configuration, consider CanvasLogic. If you need hybrid recurring and usage pricing, look harder at Nue or Subskribe. If you need a broad enterprise quote-to-cash stack on Salesforce, Revenue Cloud is the obvious benchmark.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Evaluate AI maturity</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Evaluate AI maturity with a little skepticism. A chatbot on top of static rules is not the same as AI that understands configuration, pricing, and approvals in context. Oracle’s recent release cadence shows deep embedded AI, Nue uses AI to build and audit pricing logic, and Salesforce is integrating agents directly into revenue workflows. The right question is not “Does it have AI?” but “Where does AI change operational outcomes without breaking governance?”&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Conclusion</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best AI CPQ software in 2026 is the platform that makes your revenue model easier to govern, not the one that produces the flashiest demo. For Salesforce-centric enterprises, Revenue Cloud and Agentforce are the reference point; for industrial and manufacturing complexity, Conga is especially strong; for mid-market buying teams, DealHub is practical and convincing; for SaaS monetization, Subskribe and Nue feel closest to where the market is going; for field teams, Mobileforce is unusually differentiated; and for visual product selling, CanvasLogic has a real niche.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The category is moving from quoting software to intelligent revenue infrastructure. That is why the best winners are no longer the tools that only calculate a price; they are the ones that connect commerce, approvals, contracts, billing, renewals, and analytics into one trusted operating layer.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">FAQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Can AI CPQ platforms support channel partner ecosystems?</strong><br>Yes. DealHub explicitly supports partner and channel quoting, Salesforce positions its CPQ across channels, and Subskribe includes reseller capability for revenue growth. In practice, partner support is most valuable when the same product rules, pricing guardrails, and approval policies apply to both direct and indirect sales. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>How do AI CPQ systems improve sales forecasting accuracy?</strong><br>They improve forecasting by capturing structured deal data earlier and more consistently. Salesforce notes that revenue forecasting depends on clean pipeline and financial signals, while DealHub and similar revenue-intelligence platforms use quote-level data to feed better visibility into bookings, conversion, and expansion patterns. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What KPIs should companies track after AI CPQ implementation?</strong><br>Track quote accuracy, quote response time, price realization, CPQ adoption rate, revenue from existing customers, and time to market for pricing changes. Depending on your model, you may also want approval SLA, renewal conversion, amendment cycle time, and forecast variance between quoted value and recognized revenue. </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best CPQ Software for Manufacturing Industry: Top Platforms and Selection Guide</title>
		<link>https://canvaslogic.com/best-cpq-software-for-manufacturing-industry/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Sheardown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canvaslogic.com/?p=2667</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A strong CPQ should help your team configure the right product, calculate the right price, generate the right quote, and move clean data into the rest of the business with less manual rework. ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-7387b849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<div class="wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group has-gray-background-color has-background is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Key facts:</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Manufacturers usually get the most value from CPQ when they sell configurable products, manage complex pricing, support multiple channels, and need tighter handoffs between sales, engineering, and operations.&nbsp;</li>



<li>Across current vendor documentation, the strongest manufacturing-focused platforms consistently emphasize rules-based configuration, automated quoting, CRM and ERP integration, approval workflow controls, and, in the more advanced tools, visual selling, BOM generation, and analytics.&nbsp;</li>



<li>There is no single universal winner. The best CPQ software for the manufacturing industry depends on how complex your product catalog is, whether your revenue model is list-price-plus-discount or advanced price optimization, how important dealer and reseller channels are, and whether you need 3D configuration or self-service commerce.</li>
</ul>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you are looking for the best <a href="/cpq-software/">CPQ software</a> for manufacturing, the smartest way to start is not with brand names, but with the problems you need to solve. In manufacturing, complexity tends to pile up fast: product options, engineering constraints, regional pricing, channel-specific discounting, document generation, and the need to pass accurate order data into CRM, ERP, CAD, PLM, and downstream production systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why the best CPQ software for the manufacturing sector is usually the platform that can control configuration logic without slowing the sales team down. A strong CPQ should help your team configure the right product, calculate the right price, generate the right quote, and move clean data into the rest of the business with less manual rework.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is CPQ Software for Manufacturing?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ stands for Configure, Price, Quote. In manufacturing, it is more than a quoting tool. It becomes the commercial system that turns product knowledge, pricing rules, and approval controls into a repeatable sales process that can scale across direct reps, partners, ecommerce, and field sellers.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Configure</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The configuration step is where the software guides users through valid product choices, compatible options, and dependency rules. For manufacturers, this matters because a configurable machine, enclosure, pump, or assembly may have hundreds or thousands of possible combinations, and the CPQ has to prevent combinations that engineering cannot build.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Price</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The pricing step applies list prices, customer agreements, volume discounts, margin thresholds, channel pricing, and other commercial rules. Strong manufacturing CPQ does not just calculate numbers; it protects margin, supports discount governance, and helps teams avoid misquotes that damage revenue or trigger downstream order corrections.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Quote</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The quote step turns the approved configuration and price into a professional customer-facing document or digital offer. Modern CPQ platforms also automate approvals, proposal generation, order handoff, and related workflow tasks, which is why quoting speed often improves substantially after implementation.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Manufacturing Companies Need CPQ</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Manufacturing sales are rarely a simple one-product, one-price transaction. The more product variants, dealer requests, custom BOM outputs, and approval steps you have, the more valuable CPQ becomes.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Shorter sales cycles for complex products</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When reps stop building quotes in spreadsheets and emails, they spend less time chasing technical answers and approvals. Vendors such as Tacton, Salesforce, Oracle, and Experlogix explicitly position CPQ as a way to reduce quote turnaround, simplify complex selling, and shorten the overall cycle from opportunity to order.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Fewer pricing and quoting errors</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Error reduction is one of the clearest reasons manufacturers adopt CPQ. Salesforce highlights rule-based quoting for accurate pricing, Oracle emphasizes accurate professional quotes, and Tacton points to real-time pricing based on defined rules, all of which matter when misquotes can lead to engineering rework, order failure, or margin leakage.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Better buyer and dealer experience</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Manufacturers increasingly sell through mixed channels that include direct sales, dealer networks, distributors, and self-service journeys. Tacton says its manufacturing offering supports distributors and self-service while maintaining a unified buying experience, SAP links CPQ to richer commerce journeys, and DealHub defines self-service CPQ as a way for customers to build and price products independently.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Higher sales efficiency across teams</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A good CPQ reduces the friction between sales, sales engineering, finance, and operations. Epicor says its platform streamlines sales, engineering, and manufacturing processes, while Salesforce and Oracle both frame CPQ as part of a broader quote-to-cash or revenue lifecycle system rather than a stand-alone quoting app.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="577" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-9-июл.-2026-г.-17_18_20-1-1024x577.webp" alt="A configurator of a car visible on the screen" class="wp-image-2674" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-9-июл.-2026-г.-17_18_20-1-1024x577.webp 1024w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-9-июл.-2026-г.-17_18_20-1-300x169.webp 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-9-июл.-2026-г.-17_18_20-1-768x432.webp 768w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-9-июл.-2026-г.-17_18_20-1-1536x865.webp 1536w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-9-июл.-2026-г.-17_18_20-1.webp 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Types of CPQ Solutions for Manufacturers</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not all CPQ platforms solve the same problem in the same way. In practice, manufacturers usually choose between standard process-focused CPQ, visually led CPQ, 3D CPQ, and newer AI-powered platforms.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Standard CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Standard CPQ focuses on product rules, pricing logic, discount approvals, quote generation, and integrations with CRM and ERP. This is the core model used by platforms such as Salesforce, Oracle, and SAP, and it is often enough for manufacturers whose main challenge is workflow control rather than immersive product visualization.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Visual CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Visual CPQ adds images, guided selling, and interactive selection to make complex products easier to understand. CanvasLogic and Epicor both emphasize engaging visual experiences, which can be especially valuable when buyers struggle to interpret long option lists or technical product descriptions.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">3D CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">3D CPQ goes further by letting users configure products in a realistic visual environment. CanvasLogic highlights photorealistic 3D and AR, Tacton promotes <a href="/configuration-software/">3D product visualization</a>, and Configure One Cloud provides live visualizations, making this category attractive for manufacturers selling highly customized products where shape, layout, or spatial fit matter. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">AI-powered CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-powered CPQ uses intelligence for pricing guidance, quote generation, recommendations, or workflow acceleration. PROS centers its Smart CPQ on AI-driven pricing guidance, Salesforce promotes AI-assisted quote generation, and Logik.io is now positioned by ServiceNow as an AI-powered CPQ capability.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Best CPQ Software for the Manufacturing Industry</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The platforms below are among the most relevant options for manufacturers evaluating the best CPQ for manufacturing. They are listed as top platforms, not as a one-size-fits-all ranking, because buyer fit depends on complexity, stack, and channel model.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Salesforce CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce’s CPQ capability now sits inside Revenue Cloud, which Salesforce says unifies product catalog management, pricing, quoting, contracting, order management, and invoicing on the Salesforce platform. It is a strong fit for manufacturers already standardized on Salesforce CRM and looking for guided selling, approvals, discount controls, and broader revenue process alignment.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Oracle CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle CPQ remains a serious enterprise option for manufacturers that need opportunity-to-quote-to-order orchestration, configurable products, approval workflow controls, and reliable quote accuracy. Oracle positions it for both enterprise and midsize organizations, which helps it span global manufacturers as well as more focused industrial businesses.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">SAP CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SAP CPQ is well-suited to companies that want a step-driven quoting experience tied closely to SAP’s broader commerce and ERP ecosystem. SAP highlights complex quote creation, margin protection, automated approvals, integration with SAP Sales Cloud and third-party CRM tools, and support for existing variant configuration models.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">CanvasLogic CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic stands out when visual selling is part of the buying process. Its platform combines a rules-driven configurator, dynamic pricing, one-click quote generation, and photorealistic 3D and <a href="/ar-product-configurator/">AR</a>, making it attractive for manufacturers that need both commercial control and strong visual presentation. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Epicor CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Epicor CPQ is aimed squarely at complex, custom products and explicitly connects sales, engineering, and manufacturing needs. It is a practical option for manufacturers that want visual configuration plus deeper operational alignment, and Epicor’s 2026.1 release added internal data-management capabilities to make complex configurators easier to maintain at scale.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Tacton CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tacton is one of the clearest manufacturing-first CPQ vendors in the market. Its official messaging emphasizes industrial manufacturing, distributor expansion, self-service buying, real-time pricing, and 3D visualization, so it is especially compelling for machinery and industrial equipment companies with complex commercial and technical rules.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">PROS Smart CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">PROS Smart CPQ is a strong choice when pricing sophistication is as important as configuration. PROS describes the platform as a software-agnostic engine that works across CRM and ERP systems and is designed for complex industrial product logic, extensive pricing agreements, and high-volume or mega-quote scenarios.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Conga CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Conga CPQ focuses on enterprise-grade automation for complex product configuration, accurate pricing, and large-scale quoting. Conga also emphasizes open architecture, connectors, and APIs across different CRM and ERP environments, which can matter for manufacturers that want flexibility rather than lock-in.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">DealHub CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DealHub positions itself as an AI quote-to-revenue platform rather than only a CPQ application. For manufacturers that also care about subscriptions, billing, DealRoom collaboration, and a fast self-service motion, DealHub is worth shortlisting, especially if the business runs on Salesforce, <a href="/cpq-software-for-hubspot/">HubSpot</a>, Microsoft Dynamics 365, or NetSuite ERP. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Experlogix CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Experlogix has a clear manufacturing story and strong Microsoft alignment. Its platform embeds into Dynamics 365 Sales, supports guided configuration, intelligent pricing, and approvals, and it also highlights BOM and routing automation plus industrial-grade complexity support for Salesforce users.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Logik.io</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Logik.io is now part of ServiceNow, which gives it a different strategic profile than it had as an independent CPQ vendor. The platform is positioned as composable and AI-powered, with a strong rules engine and APIs for runtime and admin automation, making it appealing to manufacturers that want a modern, extensible CPQ layer.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Cincom CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cincom remains highly relevant for manufacturers selling complex, configured products. Its manufacturing messaging stresses accurate pricing, automated BOM generation, faster sales cycles, and integrations with major CRM systems such as Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics, Oracle, and SAP.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Configure One Cloud</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Configure One Cloud from Revalize is one of the more manufacturing-specific options on the list. The vendor emphasizes more than 20 years of experience in complex manufacturing, on-the-fly configuration, point-and-click rule creation, live visualizations, and integration with ERP, CRM, CAD, and ecommerce tools.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Vendavo</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vendavo is often the better fit when manufacturing complexity is tightly tied to pricing complexity. The platform is built for B2B manufacturers and distributors and combines pricing, quoting, and agreements, rebates, AI, and analytics, which makes it especially relevant for companies trying to improve margin discipline while automating quoting.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Pricefx</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Pricefx is a logical shortlist candidate for manufacturers that care deeply about profitable deal-making and pricing transparency. Its quoting software focuses on creating custom and profitable quotes with AI support and transparent calculations, so it can be particularly attractive when CPQ decisions are driven by pricing maturity rather than visualization needs.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How to Compare CPQ Software for Manufacturing Companies?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The right comparison framework should reflect real manufacturing requirements, not generic software checklists. The criteria below are synthesized from recurring capabilities highlighted by Salesforce, Oracle, SAP, Tacton, Experlogix, Configure One Cloud, Cincom, Vendavo, and Pricefx.&nbsp;</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td>Comparison area</td><td>What to verify</td><td>Why it matters in manufacturing</td></tr><tr><td>Product configuration capabilities</td><td>Constraint handling, dependency logic, multi-level options, engineering handoff, BOM output</td><td>Weak configuration leads to invalid orders and manual rework</td></tr><tr><td>Pricing and discount management</td><td>Customer-specific pricing, margin rules, approvals, agreement pricing, price optimization</td><td>Protects revenue and reduces margin leakage</td></tr><tr><td>Quote automation</td><td>Template quality, approval routing, document generation, and order handoff</td><td>Speeds quoting and improves consistency</td></tr><tr><td>CRM and ERP integration</td><td>Native connectors, API depth, bidirectional sync, master-data governance</td><td>Keeps customer, product, and order data aligned</td></tr><tr><td>Visual and 3D configuration</td><td>Image-based or 3D selling, AR, live visualization, spatial layout</td><td>Improves buyer understanding for complex products</td></tr><tr><td>Scalability and customization</td><td>Admin tools, composability, channel support, global rollout readiness</td><td>Ensures the platform grows with your business</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Product configuration capabilities</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For manufacturers, this is the first screening gate. If the rules engine cannot represent your real product logic, the rest of the platform does not matter.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Pricing and discount management</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your business uses formulas, contract pricing, rebates, dealer discounts, or guidance to protect target margins, push pricing higher in the scorecard. This is where platforms like PROS, Vendavo, SAP, and Pricefx often stand out.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Quote automation</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Manufacturers should test not only how fast a quote can be produced, but also how cleanly approvals, branded documents, and order-ready outputs are handled. Faster quoting is helpful, but fewer downstream corrections are even more valuable.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">CRM and ERP integration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A CPQ that does not integrate well becomes another silo. Manufacturing teams should check how product catalog data, customer data, and order details move between CPQ, CRM, and ERP in real time or near real time.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Visual and 3D configuration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Visual selling is not mandatory for every company, but it is a major advantage when customers struggle to understand technical options. It can also reduce back-and-forth with dealer and reseller partners who need clarity before submitting a quote.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Scalability and customization</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ask how easily admins can update rules, pricing, and workflow logic without heavy code. Cloud maturity, APIs, and governance matter more than flashy demos once the system is live in multiple regions or channels.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How to Choose the Right CPQ Software for Manufacturing</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Choosing the right solution should be a structured business decision, not a beauty contest. The checklist below works best when used by a cross-functional team from sales, sales operations, engineering, IT, finance, and channel management.&nbsp;</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td>Selection checkpoint</td><td>Questions to ask</td><td>Pass signal</td></tr><tr><td>Define product complexity</td><td>How many options, dependencies, and exceptions exist? Do you need BOM or routing output?</td><td>Vendor models your real complexity in the demo</td></tr><tr><td>Map your sales and quoting process</td><td>Where do delays, approvals, and errors happen today?</td><td>Vendor shows a cleaner future-state workflow</td></tr><tr><td>Evaluate integration requirements</td><td>Which CRM, ERP, CAD, PLM, ecommerce, and analytics tools must connect?</td><td>Connectors or APIs are proven, not promised</td></tr><tr><td>Check support for custom pricing models</td><td>Do you need formulas, contract pricing, rebates, currencies, or margin guardrails?</td><td>Pricing logic matches your commercial model</td></tr><tr><td>Assess user experience and adoption</td><td>Can reps, engineers, partners, and admins use it without constant support?</td><td>Demo feels intuitive for daily users</td></tr><tr><td>Review implementation time and vendor support</td><td>What is required for rollout, training, governance, and change management?</td><td>Vendor has a realistic plan and support model</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Define product complexity</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Start with product truth, not vendor slides. If your products require engineering-style rules, optional accessories, service bundles, or generated BOM output, your shortlist should immediately narrow to the platforms that can prove it.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Map your sales and quoting process</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Document the current workflow from opportunity through quote, approval, and order entry. The best CPQ software for the manufacturing sector is usually the one that removes the most friction from your real process, not the one with the longest feature list.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Evaluate integration requirements</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Manufacturers should treat integration as a first-order requirement. If CRM, ERP, ecommerce, PLM, or analytics integration is weak, the platform may create new problems even if the quoting interface looks impressive.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Check support for custom pricing models</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A manufacturer with simple price books needs a different platform from a manufacturer with customer agreements, formulas, floor margins, global currencies, and channel-specific rebates. Make vendors prove your pricing case in the demo.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Assess user experience and adoption</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best software is the one your team actually uses. Reps, partner managers, dealer users, and administrators should all test the system, because adoption failure usually comes from poor daily usability rather than missing edge-case features.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Review implementation time and vendor support</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, look beyond the product itself. Training, admin maintenance, rollout sequencing, and vendor enablement can make the difference between a strong launch and an expensive stalled project.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Are the Future Trends in CPQ for Manufacturing?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Manufacturing CPQ is moving beyond static quote generation toward a broader buyer-engagement and revenue-operations layer. The direction of travel is clear across major vendors: more AI, more visual selling, and more self-service.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">AI-assisted configuration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is increasingly used to reduce manual quote effort, guide pricing, and speed decisions. Salesforce promotes AI-assisted quoting, PROS centers AI-driven pricing guidance in complex industrial selling, and ServiceNow’s positioning of Logik.io reinforces that AI-enabled CPQ is now a mainstream expectation.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Visual and 3D selling</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Visual configuration is becoming less of a niche feature and more of a competitive selling tool. CanvasLogic, Tacton, and Configure One Cloud all highlight 3D or live visualization, which suggests that buyers increasingly expect to see what they are buying before they approve the deal.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Self-service buying experiences</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Manufacturers are also expanding CPQ into guided self-service journeys for customers, distributors, and channel partners. SAP links CPQ to B2B commerce, Tacton highlights distributors and customer self-service, and DealHub explicitly defines self-service CPQ as independent product building and pricing.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Conclusion</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best CPQ software for manufacturing is not the one with the loudest marketing. It is the one that can represent your product complexity, support your pricing model, fit your CRM and ERP landscape, and make the quoting workflow easier for both internal teams and external channels.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For many manufacturers, the shortlist will come down to three broad patterns: Salesforce, Oracle, or SAP for ecosystem alignment; Tacton, Epicor, Cincom, Experlogix, or Configure One Cloud for deeper manufacturing fit; and Vendavo, PROS, or Pricefx when pricing intelligence is the real differentiator. That is the practical lens to use when deciding on the best CPQ software for the manufacturing industry.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">FAQ</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What data should manufacturers prepare before CPQ implementation?</strong><br>Prepare a clean product catalog, configuration rules, option dependencies, price books, discount policies, approval matrices, customer account data, channel logic, and the integration map for CRM, ERP, CAD, PLM, and analytics systems. If BOM or routing automation is important, that data model should be defined early as well.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>How do manufacturers measure CPQ ROI after implementation?</strong><br>The clearest ROI metrics are quote turnaround time, quote accuracy or order failure rate, approval cycle time, margin realization, adoption rate, and revenue impact such as higher win rate or larger deal size. Oracle, Conga, and NetSuite all point to metrics like accuracy, response time, price realization, and quote completion time as useful ways to measure success.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Can CPQ support dealer networks and distributor sales?</strong><br>Yes. Several leading platforms explicitly support indirect channels. Tacton highlights distributor expansion and self-service, SAP supports commerce-connected journeys, and DealHub frames self-service CPQ as a way for customers or channel users to configure and price products without waiting for a rep. That makes CPQ highly relevant for dealer and reseller models in the manufacturing sector.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle CPQ vs. Salesforce CPQ: Complete Enterprise CPQ Comparison Guide</title>
		<link>https://canvaslogic.com/oracle-cpq-vs-salesforce-cpq/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Sheardown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 11:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canvaslogic.com/?p=2594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oracle and Salesforce both solve the same core problem: helping revenue teams sell complex products without getting lost in spreadsheets, manual pricing exceptions, or slow approval chains. The difference is where each platform puts its center of gravity.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-7387b849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<div class="wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group has-gray-background-color has-background is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Key Facts:</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Oracle CPQ is strongest when quoting sits close to Oracle commercial operations. </li>



<li>Salesforce has the clearer public pricing story and appears slightly easier to adopt for many CRM-native teams.</li>



<li>Oracle often rewards teams that need deeper control over pricing and commercial rules. </li>



<li>A move from legacy Salesforce CPQ into the newer Salesforce revenue architecture is not a simple data transfer.</li>
</ul>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle and Salesforce both solve the same core problem: helping revenue teams sell complex products without getting lost in spreadsheets, manual pricing exceptions, or slow approval chains. The difference is where each platform puts its center of gravity.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is a CPQ Platform?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A <a href="/cpq-software/">CPQ platform</a> is software that helps sales teams configure products correctly, apply the right pricing and discounts, generate accurate quotes, and move those quotes toward order capture without breaking margin rules or policy. In simple terms, CPQ acts like the rulebook and calculator behind enterprise selling.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="960" height="527" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-5-июн.-2026-г.-13_58_09.webp" alt="Oracle Sales Cloud and how it works in combination with Oracle CPQ" class="wp-image-2600" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-5-июн.-2026-г.-13_58_09.webp 960w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-5-июн.-2026-г.-13_58_09-300x165.webp 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-5-июн.-2026-г.-13_58_09-768x422.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px" /></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is Oracle CPQ?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle CPQ is Oracle&#8217;s cloud-based CPQ application for helping sellers configure the right mix of products or services and generate accurate professional quotes.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Pros and cons</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Pros.</strong> Oracle&#8217;s strengths are easiest to see in complex enterprise scenarios. Its public product materials emphasize reusable product models, AI-driven suggestions, multi-book and channel pricing, deal scoring, discount optimization, mobile-first approvals, recurring subscription support, and self-service selling across direct, indirect, and ecommerce channels.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Cons.</strong> Oracle&#8217;s flexibility comes with a heavier administration model. Oracle&#8217;s Redwood admin experience now consolidates navigation for products, prices, configurations, data tables, integrations, migration tooling, development tools, and UI settings, which is excellent for control but signals a platform that still expects disciplined administration.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="959" height="526" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-5-июн.-2026-г.-14_03_11.webp" alt="Salesforce CPQ - how it works" class="wp-image-2601" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-5-июн.-2026-г.-14_03_11.webp 959w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-5-июн.-2026-г.-14_03_11-300x165.webp 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-5-июн.-2026-г.-14_03_11-768x421.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 959px) 100vw, 959px" /></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is Salesforce CPQ?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For enterprise buyers in 2026, &#8220;Salesforce CPQ&#8221; now covers two related realities. There is still a large installed base and documentation footprint for <a href="/cpq-in-salesforce/">Salesforce CPQ</a>, but Salesforce&#8217;s current strategic revenue platform is branded Agentforce Revenue Management, formerly Revenue Cloud.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Pros and cons</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Pros.</strong> Salesforce&#8217;s biggest advantage is native fit for companies already centered on Salesforce CRM. The current product story combines CPQ, centralized product catalog and pricing, order capture, subscriptions, contracts, invoicing, self-service channels, partner selling, field workflows, APIs, and AI inside the same platform family.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Cons.</strong> The challenge is roadmap complexity, not lack of capability. Salesforce is clearly steering buyers toward Agentforce Revenue Management and a newer product-to-cash architecture, and its own migration guidance says moving from Salesforce CPQ to that newer model is more than a data exercise.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Oracle CPQ vs. Salesforce CPQ: Core Feature Comparison</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Capability</strong></td><td><strong>Oracle CPQ</strong></td><td><strong>Salesforce CPQ</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Product configuration and guided selling</strong></td><td>Guided pathways, reusable product models, AI suggestions, self-service co-configuration, subscription, and service ordering</td><td>Guided selling flows, attribute-based catalog, rules-based and constraint-based configurator, reusable templates</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Pricing management and discount governance</strong></td><td>Multiple price books, promotions, localization, channel pricing, multitier pricing, price scoring, deal context, automated approvals</td><td>Configurable pricing engine, visible calculation logic, volume/compound/proportional discounts, workflow-driven approval chains</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Quote generation and proposal automation</strong></td><td>Branded quote and proposal generation, real-time pricing on quotes, document APIs, and commerce portal proposal sharing</td><td>Dynamic quote documents, templates, quote document APIs, PDF generation, AI quote creation/modification/summarization</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Approval workflows and sales automation</strong></td><td>Dynamic routing, workflow approvals, smart notifications, mobile-first approvals</td><td>Advanced Approvals, serial/parallel chains, Flow-based orchestration, and role-based access in the quote lifecycle</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">User Experience and Ease of Adoption</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For many enterprises, the ease of adoption of technologies is just as important as the benefits these techs can bring.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Interface and navigation</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Salesforce currently has the more familiar seller-facing message. Its CPQ page explicitly promises a spreadsheet-like UI and guided selling, which fits the expectations of sales teams already working inside Salesforce.</li>



<li>Oracle is actively modernizing. Oracle&#8217;s 26A readiness materials introduced the Redwood-style Administration UX, with improved navigation, consolidated views, simplified design, and a stated goal of reducing training time.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Admin flexibility and customization</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Oracle gives administrators a lot of control. The current admin model spans products, configuration dashboards, pricing portals, commerce rules, integrations, data tables, development tools, logs, migration center, and UI settings.</li>



<li>Salesforce gives admins flexibility through a more platform-familiar model. Salesforce documents point-and-click or code-based configuration approaches, Product Discovery and billing APIs, custom LWC-based third-party configurator components, Lightning Message Service integration, and workflow extensions through the broader Salesforce platform.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Learning curve for sales teams</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For sellers, both platforms can feel much simpler than manual quoting once the rules are in place. Oracle reviewers on G2 explicitly say that once configured, Oracle CPQ is simple to use and strong for precise pricing and quoting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce tends to feel faster for CRM-native reps, but it is not effortless. User-review snippets still mention a learning curve, especially when teams move beyond basic CPQ into broader product-to-cash and revenue-management workflows.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Integration Ecosystem and CRM Compatibility</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For most enterprises, the real value of a CPQ platform depends not only on its quoting capabilities but also on how effectively it connects with CRM, ERP, billing, ecommerce, and other business systems.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Oracle CPQ integration capabilities</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle documents integration with Oracle Sales, Oracle Commerce, Oracle Subscription Management, Oracle Order Management, and Oracle Integration through the Oracle CPQ Adapter. Oracle also explicitly states that Oracle CPQ can integrate with any CRM solution, including Salesforce Sales Cloud.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Salesforce CPQ integration capabilities</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When opportunities, accounts, activities, approvals, service work, and partner processes already live in Salesforce, CPQ does not have to bridge as many user-context gaps. Salesforce&#8217;s newer revenue architecture also leans heavily into APIs, with public documentation for Product Discovery APIs, billing APIs, usage APIs, and native business APIs across product-to-cash operations.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">ERP, billing, and ecommerce connectivity</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Oracle&#8217;s back-end alignment is one of its strongest enterprise arguments. Oracle Commerce can call Oracle CPQ for complex ecommerce configuration, Oracle Order Management can orchestrate the resulting orders, and Oracle Subscription Management handles subscription and usage-based lifecycle scenarios.</li>



<li>Salesforce&#8217;s connectivity story is broader across CRM-led channels. Salesforce positions Revenue Cloud Billing as flexible with ERP systems, supports billing inside the revenue stack, and ties CPQ into self-service channels, partner selling, field service, and B2B Commerce interoperability.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Implementation Complexity and Time-to-Value</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To make the right choice, Oracle CPQ vs. Salesforce CPQ, it’s important to carefully analyze how complicated it would be to implement either of these technologies and how quickly you can reap the benefits:</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Oracle CPQ implementation considerations</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The platform gives teams migration package APIs, migration-task APIs, a CLI-based developer toolkit, data-table import/export support, and additional test-environment options.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Salesforce CPQ implementation considerations</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce&#8217;s implementation guidance is more explicitly phased. Salesforce says teams should gather requirements, sequence feature deployment, set project milestones, import data, and work closely with business users.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Migration and data synchronization challenges</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Salesforce&#8217;s migration guidance is unusually clear that moving from Salesforce CPQ to the newer Revenue Management model is not just a record export and import. Product catalog migration is described as an architectural evolution, and quotes can require header- and line-level reconciliation. </li>



<li>Oracle&#8217;s challenge shows up in a different way. Oracle has had to improve how CPQ maps external product identifiers when synchronizing both Fusion and Salesforce product structures, and Oracle has also announced the deprecation of one near-real-time synchronization mode in favor of batch synchronization for product sync.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI, Automation, and Advanced Revenue Operations Features</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence is becoming a major differentiator in modern CPQ platforms, extending beyond quote generation to influence pricing decisions, approval processes, and revenue forecasting.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">AI-assisted recommendations and guided selling</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Oracle has added a substantial amount of AI to CPQ over the last several releases. Official readiness materials list AI-generated product recommendations, an AI-powered quote assistance agent, generative AI quote summaries, an AI rewrite assistant for the Redwood quote UI, and AI-generated descriptions for CPQ rules. Oracle&#8217;s public product page also talks about AI-driven suggestions, dynamic pricing guidance, and predictive recommendations. </li>



<li>Salesforce&#8217;s AI message is more agent-centric. Salesforce says Agentforce can generate, update, and send quotes, suggest upgrades and add-ons, and streamline revenue operations through AI-powered agents embedded in the revenue platform. Salesforce also positions Agentforce Revenue Management as the AI-forward evolution of Revenue Cloud. </li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Workflow automation and approval intelligence</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Oracle&#8217;s automation story focuses on routing the right exceptions to the right approvers, reducing delays, and helping teams understand deal quality through price intelligence, margin insights, and win-probability signals.</li>



<li>Salesforce combines workflow automation with its broader platform workflow language. Advanced Approvals, Flow Orchestrations, quote approval chains, and agent-driven quote actions create a stronger public story for automation beyond quoting itself.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Analytics and revenue forecasting</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Oracle&#8217;s current CPQ messaging emphasizes pricing and deal intelligence: margin insight, discount trends, deal scoring, win probability, and prioritization. </li>



<li>Salesforce is more explicit in public about packaged analytics. Revenue Cloud Advanced includes AI and analytics in its edition packaging, Salesforce documents Revenue Management Intelligence as a suite of Tableau Einstein dashboards, and its asset lifecycle messaging mentions reporting metrics such as ARR and NRR.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Oracle CPQ vs. Salesforce CPQ: Pricing and Licensing</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Pricing dimension</strong></td><td><strong>Oracle CPQ</strong></td><td><strong>Salesforce CPQ</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Public price reference found</strong></td><td>Oracle Fusion CPQ Cloud Service is listed at $240 per hosted named user per month in Oracle&#8217;s U.S. public-sector price detail dated May 21, 2026.&nbsp;</td><td>Revenue Cloud Growth is listed at $150 per user per month, and Revenue Cloud Advanced is at $200 per user per month, billed annually.&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Minimums and contract terms in public materials</strong></td><td>Oracle&#8217;s global CPQ price list shows a minimum quantity of 25 for the base service and says initial quotes for CPQ subscriptions require a minimum three-year contract term unless otherwise approved.&nbsp;</td><td>Salesforce states the edition requires an annual contract and also notes that Revenue Cloud requires a Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, or CRM license.&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Entry-tier scope</strong></td><td>Oracle base CPQ pricing is published separately from add-ons and support options.&nbsp;</td><td>Revenue Cloud Growth includes Quoting &amp; Configurator, Order Capture, and Subscriptions. Revenue Cloud Advanced adds Contracts &amp; Orders, Consumption &amp; Invoicing, and AI &amp; Analytics.&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Add-ons publicly visible</strong></td><td>Oracle publicly lists add-ons such as Channel Users, Salesforce connector licenses, external connector-user packs, API access/interactions, Commerce for CPQ, and test environments.&nbsp;</td><td>Salesforce separately publishes Standard, Premier, and Signature success plans, and related revenue products such as Revenue Cloud Billing.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Security, Compliance, and Enterprise Scalability</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Area</strong></td><td><strong>Oracle</strong></td><td><strong>Salesforce</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Compliance documentation model</strong></td><td>Oracle Cloud Compliance explains a shared-responsibility model and provides attestations and advisories by service family, with the explicit warning that coverage can be service- and region-specific.&nbsp;</td><td>Salesforce Trust &amp; Compliance Documentation provides SPARC, infrastructure, and sub-processor documents, product terms, and trusted AI resources, with product-specific documentation directories.&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Publicly listed compliance examples</strong></td><td>Oracle&#8217;s compliance portal lists frameworks such as CSA STAR, ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 20000-1, ISO 22301, and many others across Oracle cloud services. Oracle Integration also states compliance for SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and HIPAA.&nbsp;</td><td>Salesforce&#8217;s compliance catalog publicly lists categories including GDPR, HIPAA, IRAP, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 42001, PCI DSS, SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, TISAX, and many more.&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Security controls highlighted publicly</strong></td><td>Oracle emphasizes OCI&#8217;s security-first design, Oracle Software Security Assurance, and trust-center resources for security, privacy, compliance, and availability monitoring.&nbsp;</td><td>Salesforce highlights Shield Platform Encryption, Event Monitoring, Field Audit Trail, secure sharing architecture, and service-specific trust/compliance documentation.&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Availability and operational transparency</strong></td><td>Oracle publishes cloud status and availability resources for OCI and Fusion Cloud Applications and ties them to SLAs and notification feeds.&nbsp;</td><td>Salesforce publishes trust and compliance resources and points buyers to service-specific documentation and trust resources for infrastructure and controls.&nbsp;</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Ideal Customer Profiles and Industry Fit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s figure out when it is better to choose Salesforce CPQ vs. Oracle CPQ:</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">When to choose Oracle CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Choose Oracle CPQ when you want CPQ to sit close to operational execution, not just CRM activity.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">When to choose Salesforce CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Choose Salesforce CPQ, or more precisely, Salesforce&#8217;s current revenue stack, when the commercial center of gravity is already Salesforce.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How to Choose the Right CPQ Platform</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Start with the system your sellers already trust.</strong> If your teams spend their day in Salesforce and want quoting to feel like a native extension of opportunity management, Salesforce usually reduces friction. If your commercial process is tightly bound to Oracle order, subscription, commerce, and back-office execution, Oracle usually reduces integration friction. </li>



<li><strong>Decide where the pricing authority should live.</strong> Oracle&#8217;s public positioning puts strong emphasis on pricing intelligence, margin control, and governed commercial rules. Salesforce&#8217;s public story puts a stronger emphasis on a configurable platform engine inside a broader revenue architecture. If pricing governance is the business problem, Oracle will often shine. If workflow and platform unification are the business problem, Salesforce may shine.</li>



<li><strong>Be honest about product complexity.</strong> Both vendors can model complex products. Oracle leans toward formal enterprise control and large-scale quote execution. Salesforce leans toward attribute-based catalog design, composability, and cross-channel reuse.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">CanvasLogic&#8217;s CPQ</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic is especially interesting when the configured product itself needs to be seen, understood, and validated visually during the selling process. In other words, if the product experience is part of the sale, not just the quote, CanvasLogic deserves attention. CanvasLogic provides extensive <a href="/configuration-software/">3D</a> &amp; <a href="https://canvaslogic.com/ar-product-configurator/">AR product configuration</a> and CPQ services for <a href="/cpq-for-electronic-manufacturing/">electronic manufacturing</a>, <a href="https://canvaslogic.com/cpq-for-b2b-ecommerce/">B2B ecommerce</a>, <a href="/cpq-for-furniture/">furniture manufacturing</a>, <a href="/medical-equipment-cpq/">medical device manufacturing</a>, and other industries. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Conclusion</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you want the simplest buying takeaway, use this rule: choose Oracle CPQ when quote accuracy and rule control matter most; choose Salesforce CPQ when CRM-native usability, platform unification, and the modern revenue roadmap matter most. And if visual product selling is central to how you win deals, keep CanvasLogic in the conversation as a meaningful alternative lens, not just a smaller version of the same market.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">FAQ</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Can Oracle CPQ integrate with Salesforce CRM?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yes. Oracle CPQ can integrate with any CRM solution, including Salesforce Sales Cloud. Oracle Integration also publishes a bidirectional synchronization recipe between Oracle CPQ transactions and Salesforce quotes, and Oracle documents support for the Oracle CPQ Connector for Salesforce.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Is Salesforce CPQ suitable for manufacturing companies with complex product catalogs?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yes, for many manufacturers it is. Salesforce&#8217;s current revenue stack supports an attribute-based catalog, product structures with complex hierarchies, and a configurator that supports both rules-based and constraint-based configuration. Salesforce also ties the catalog into B2B Commerce and describes integration with PIM, PLM, and ERP.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">How does Salesforce CPQ handle subscription and recurring billing models?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce publicly packages Subscriptions in Revenue Cloud Growth. Revenue Cloud Advanced adds Contracts &amp; Orders plus Consumption &amp; Invoicing, and Salesforce&#8217;s billing materials describe invoicing for milestones, usage, amendments, cancellations, and flexible charge types and payment schedules. Salesforce also publishes usage-management APIs and subscription-related lifecycle documentation.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Which platform is easier to customize: Oracle CPQ or Salesforce CPQ?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce is easier to customize day to day because the platform relies on patterns admins and developers already know: flows, permission sets, Lightning components, APIs, and business rules.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For teams that need deeper specialized control, Oracle can go further through BML scripting, pricing-engine scripts, data tables, migration tooling, and broad admin control over commerce and configuration objects.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Headless CPQ</title>
		<link>https://canvaslogic.com/headless-cpq/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Sheardown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 11:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canvaslogic.com/?p=2539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Traditional CPQ was designed for a world in which most quotes were created within a single seller-facing application. That still works in simpler environments, but it becomes restrictive when the same business needs to support direct sales, distributors, portals, ecommerce, and mobile at once. ]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-7387b849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<div class="wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group has-gray-background-color has-background is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Key Takeaways:</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Headless CPQ separates the front-end from the back-end configuration, pricing, and quoting engine, so the same logic can power seller, partner, and self-service experiences. </li>



<li>It uses APIs to expose rules, approvals, and quote actions across any surface, making integration, commerce, and workflow design more flexible. </li>



<li>Its rise is tied to omnichannel buying, self-service expectations, and wider adoption of composable, API-first technology models.</li>
</ul>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditional CPQ was designed for a world in which most quotes were created within a single seller-facing application. That still works in simpler environments, but it becomes restrictive when the same business needs to support direct sales, distributors, portals, ecommerce, and mobile at once.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Headless CPQ solves that by keeping the “brain” in the back end and letting any front-end call it through APIs. The result is a simpler way to reuse configuration rules, pricing logic, and quoting automation across channels without rebuilding them on every platform.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is Headless CPQ?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Headless CPQ is an API-driven approach to <a href="/cpq-software/">Configure, Price, Quote</a>, in which the user interface is decoupled from the CPQ engine. The engine still manages product configuration, pricing, approvals, and quote creation, but those functions can be called from websites, portals, internal tools, and custom applications. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, a buyer or rep makes selections in one interface, the back end checks the catalog and rules, calculates pricing, validates the configuration, and returns a result in real time. That basic pattern is the core of headless CPQ architecture.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Headless CPQ vs Traditional CPQ</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Aspect</strong></td><td><strong>Headless CPQ architecture</strong></td><td><strong>Traditional CPQ</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Interface model</td><td>Decoupled front-end calls the engine through APIs.</td><td>UI and logic are more tightly linked.</td></tr><tr><td>Channel support</td><td>One engine can serve commerce, portals, mobile, and seller tools.</td><td>New channels are harder to extend consistently.</td></tr><tr><td>Change speed</td><td>UX can evolve without rewriting core quote logic.</td><td>Experience changes are more constrained by the suite.</td></tr><tr><td>Integration and scale</td><td>API-first delivery fits CRM, ERP, and commerce orchestration, and modular cloud services can be tuned for performance.</td><td>Integrations exist, but custom surfaces are less flexible, and optimization depends more on the suite’s built-in architecture.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Synonyms and Related Concepts</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You will also see headless CPQ described as API-first CPQ, API-first quoting, or a headless quoting environment. These ideas overlap, but they are not identical. API-first is the design approach; headless is the architectural outcome where the presentation layer is no longer tied to one back end.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A related concept is composable commerce. In a composable stack, CPQ becomes one modular business capability alongside catalog, checkout, search, and content services.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Headless Architecture Is Transforming CPQ</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Headless architecture is transforming CPQ because quoting is no longer trapped inside one interface. The same back-end services can now support self-service buyers, partners, internal sales teams, and digital commerce flows with one set of rules, one product catalog, and one approval framework.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That changes CPQ from a single application feature into a reusable service, which is exactly how modern digital systems are increasingly being built.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Market Drivers Behind Headless CPQ Adoption</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s look at the main reasons why headless CPQ architecture is being adopted more and more these days:</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><br>Demand for omnichannel commerce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">B2B buyers increasingly move between people, portals, and digital touchpoints. Market research shows that leading organizations continue to invest in omnichannel sales, while modern B2B commerce guidance places self-service configuration, pricing, and quote generation much closer to the center of the buying journey. That makes headless CPQ a natural fit for omnichannel commerce.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Need for flexible front ends</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The second driver is experience freedom. When the front end and back end are separate, teams can redesign buying journeys, test new user flows, and tailor interfaces for buyers, dealers, or field sales without rebuilding the back end every time. That is one of the clearest architectural reasons companies move toward headless systems. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Rise of composable commerce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Composable technology is also moving into the mainstream. Recent MACH research reports broad implementation, strong ROI, and notable gains in customer experience, automation through better systems integration, and agility. Separate industry guidance also suggests composability is becoming a more formal buying requirement, which reinforces demand for headless CPQ inside modern revenue stacks.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-13-мая-2026-г.-14_25_22-1024x576.png" alt="Front end decoupled from back end, headless CPQ" class="wp-image-2541" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-13-мая-2026-г.-14_25_22-1024x576.png 1024w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-13-мая-2026-г.-14_25_22-300x169.png 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-13-мая-2026-г.-14_25_22-768x432.png 768w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-13-мая-2026-г.-14_25_22-1536x864.png 1536w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/ChatGPT-Image-13-мая-2026-г.-14_25_22.png 1672w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Headless CPQ Works</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A typical headless CPQ workflow has four layers: the front end, an API layer, the CPQ engine, and connected systems such as CRM, ERP, and commerce. The front end captures choices. The API passes structured requests. The engine applies rules, pricing, and approvals. Connected systems provide customer, order, financial, and product data.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">API-first architecture explained</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In an API-first model, the platform is designed to expose quote actions as services. Some tools can return real-time pricing and product configuration data without first creating a formal quote record, while others expose cart and quote APIs that hide the internal complexity of CPQ processing from client developers.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This matters because it prevents rule duplication. Teams do not need to rebuild logic in every application; they call the same back-end service instead. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Integration with CRM, ERP, and ecommerce</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integration is where much of the business value shows up. CRM adds account and opportunity context. ERP contributes financial and fulfillment data. Commerce provides the buying surface. Product systems supply the catalog. When those inputs are connected, headless CPQ can keep quotes accurate across sales-assisted and self-service motions.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Role of microservices and cloud</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Modern headless delivery is often paired with microservices and cloud-native services. Microservices let capabilities be managed independently. Cloud deployment adds elastic scaling, availability, and automated updates. Together, they help organizations support peak traffic, multiple channels, and frequent change. The role of microservices is especially important when pricing, catalog, and workflow logic need to evolve at different speeds.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Key Capabilities of Headless CPQ Platforms</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What are the main benefits you can get after adopting a headless CPQ platform?</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Dynamic pricing and configuration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A modern platform can enforce compatibility rules during configuration and apply volume discounts, regional pricing, channel pricing, promotions, and subscription logic in the same flow. That gives teams centralized control while still allowing flexible selling experiences.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Real-time quoting via APIs</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Real-time quoting lets external applications receive priced configurations or formal quote outputs instantly. This shortens cycle time and makes self-service much more realistic for complex products and services.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Custom UI and front-end freedom</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Because the quoting engine is decoupled, teams can build different experiences for buyers, partners, and internal sales. SDKs, web components, JavaScript modules, iframe embeds, and pure API delivery all support this front-end freedom.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Scalability and performance</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Headless systems are also designed for scalability. Cloud APIs, intelligent caching, and faster cart operations help support heavy traffic, large catalogs, and responsive experiences across channels.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Benefits of Headless CPQ</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most important headless CPQ benefits go beyond simple flexibility.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Benefits for businesses</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses gain reuse, control, and faster change. Centralized rules reduce rework, improve integration, and make it easier to launch new products, channels, and experiences without multiplying back-end logic. Research on composable architectures also connects this model with gains in customer experience, automation, and adaptability.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Benefits for sales teams</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sales teams spend less time on manual pricing, quote rework, and approval chasing. Guided selling, real-time calculations, and automated document generation help them stay inside policy while moving faster. In practical terms, CPQ is designed to let sellers focus more on selling and less on assembling quotes by hand.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Benefits for customers</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Customers get quicker, more transparent buying journeys. They can configure products, see pricing, and move between self-service and assisted sales without restarting the process. When the same back-end powers every touchpoint, the experience also feels more consistent and trustworthy.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Headless CPQ in Practice: Real-World Use Cases</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s have a look at the industries where headless CPQ is used most often:</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Manufacturing and complex products</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Manufacturing is a natural fit because products often have interdependent options, engineering constraints, and frequent catalog changes. CPQ rules validate what can actually be built and priced, which helps reduce downstream errors in procurement, production, and fulfillment.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">B2B ecommerce and self-service portals</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In <a href="/cpq-for-b2b-ecommerce/">B2B ecommerce</a>, headless CPQ bridges the gap between complex selling and digital buying. It lets buyers research, configure, and request or generate quotes inside storefronts and portals instead of falling back to email and manual workflow. Vendor guidance for digital commerce and B2B CPQ increasingly frames this as a self-service requirement, not a nice-to-have. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Subscription and SaaS pricing models</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Subscription businesses benefit because they must handle recurring charges, proration, bundles, renewals, and usage-based models. A headless approach lets these pricing services work inside product-led, portal, and rep-assisted flows from the same back end.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Headless CPQ vs Monolithic CPQ: Before and After</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Scenario</strong></td><td><strong>Before</strong></td><td><strong>After</strong></td></tr><tr><td>New channel</td><td>Extra custom quoting logic or awkward embeds.</td><td>Same engine exposed through APIs.</td></tr><tr><td>UX redesign</td><td>Limited by the original suite UI.</td><td>Frontend can change independently.</td></tr><tr><td>Peak traffic</td><td>A tightly coupled application can become a bottleneck.</td><td>Caching and elastic scaling improve responsiveness.</td></tr><tr><td>Rules reuse</td><td>Harder to keep the catalog and pricing consistent across motions.</td><td>One back-end service governs all channels.</td></tr><tr><td>Architecture change</td><td>Replacing one part of the stack is difficult.</td><td>Modular services are easier to swap or extend.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Challenges and Considerations</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What should you consider before adopting a headless CPQ platform?</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Implementation complexity</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Headless CPQ is powerful, but it is not automatically simple. Product modeling, API design, testing, and workflow mapping still require discipline, and research on composable adoption shows that leadership support and organizational readiness remain common barriers.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Integration effort</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integration effort is the next challenge. Teams need clear ownership for product data, pricing, approvals, quote status, and synchronization between CRM, ERP, and commerce systems. Public vendor guidance also makes clear that complexity rises with the number of systems, price lists, rules, and supporting assets involved.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Governance and data consistency</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Governance matters because every channel must use the same approved rules, product definitions, and discount logic. If the catalog or pricing model is poorly governed, consistency breaks quickly. Digital-commerce documentation also shows how much performance and eligibility behavior can depend on properly managed context rules, caching, and product metadata.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The Role of MACH Architecture in Headless CPQ</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MACH is a useful framework for understanding headless CPQ. It combines microservices, API-first design, cloud-native SaaS, and headless delivery. That maps closely to what advanced CPQ programs need: independently managed services, reusable APIs, elastic infrastructure, and flexible experiences.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In this model, CPQ becomes a packaged business capability that works alongside commerce, search, identity, content, and billing rather than sitting as a closed bolt-on. Wider MACH research suggests that enterprises are increasingly comfortable with exactly this kind of modular assembly.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Future Trends in Headless CPQ</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next phase of headless CPQ is likely to be even more programmatic. Enterprise platforms are exposing more business capabilities as APIs and tools that can be used by apps, humans, and AI agents across many surfaces. That points toward broader use of quoting logic outside the browser-based application model.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the same time, CPQ roadmaps increasingly point toward conversational configuration, automated quote assembly, smarter pricing recommendations, and deeper workflow orchestration. AI may accelerate those trends, but clean back-end logic and data governance will still be the foundation.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Headless CPQ Matters for Modern Enterprises</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Modern enterprises need to support more channels while keeping control over pricing, approvals, and customer experience. Headless CPQ helps because it turns quoting into a reusable business service that can support both sales and commerce without duplicating logic.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more a company depends on consistency across platforms, the more valuable that model becomes. In that sense, headless CPQ is not just a technical preference; it is a way to make complex selling more resilient as channels and buyer expectations keep changing.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why CanvasLogic for CPQ Solutions?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The platform stands out for businesses that sell configurable products and want more than static quoting. Its CPQ positioning combines a rules-driven configurator, dynamic pricing, automated quote generation, and visual <a href="https://canvaslogic.com/configuration-software/">3D</a> or <a href="/ar-product-configurator/">AR</a> experiences, which help customers understand complex products before they buy. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It also emphasizes omnichannel deployment and integration. Its CPQ supports iframe, API, and JavaScript SDK embed options, along with CRM, ERP, PIM, PLM, and commerce connections. That makes it attractive for companies that want guided selling and quoting across ecommerce and sales-assisted channels.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">In Closing</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Headless CPQ is not just CPQ with an API. It is an architectural shift that separates the front end from the back end, centralizes rules, and makes quoting available wherever buyers and sellers work.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For companies with complex catalogs, multiple channels, and growing self-service expectations, that shift can improve speed, accuracy, and scalability without sacrificing governance.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">FAQ</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">How long does a headless CPQ implementation usually take?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Implementation time varies widely. A focused rollout with a limited catalog and clear ownership can go live in weeks; one public case study documents a two-week implementation. Broader programs can take much longer when they include more systems, more rules, more assets, and deeper process redesign.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Can headless CPQ be used for small and mid-sized businesses?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yes. The real question is not size but complexity. Official CPQ documentation clearly states that modern CPQ is for enterprise and midsize organizations, and the business case is stronger when a company has configurable products, complex pricing, multiple channels, or recurring quote errors. The “small business” part is therefore more of an implementation-fit question than an architecture limit. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">What industries benefit the most from implementing headless CPQ?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The strongest fit is usually in sectors with complex products, variable pricing, or repeatable self-service demand, especially manufacturing, electronics, industrial equipment, B2B ecommerce, and subscription or SaaS businesses. Those are the environments where configuration rules, dynamic pricing, and fast quoting matter most.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CRM and CPQ: What’s the Difference?</title>
		<link>https://canvaslogic.com/crm-and-cpq/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Sheardown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 16:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canvaslogic.com/?p=2119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Key Insights Most sales teams do not struggle because they lack leads. They struggle because revenue processes break down under complexity. Products have many options, pricing has many rules, and customers expect fast responses across digital channels. CPQ software makes quoting reliable and fast. It standardizes configuration and pricing logic. At the same time, CRM [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-7387b849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<div class="wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group has-gray-background-color has-background is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Key Insights</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>CRM is a system for managing a company’s interactions with current and potential customers. It puts customer information into one place so teams can act on it.&nbsp;</li>



<li>CPQ software automates product configuration, pricing, and quote generation. It helps increase sales efficiency and reduce errors.&nbsp;</li>



<li>CRM is typically the system of record for accounts, contacts, and opportunities, including the sales pipeline and many activities that precede quoting.&nbsp;</li>



<li>CPQ sits inside the quote stage of quote to cash, where offers are configured and translated into accurate quotations and proposals.&nbsp;</li>



<li>Integrating CRM with CPQ improves proposal speed and accuracy, reduces errors, and can be done via APIs or integrated product architectures.&nbsp;</li>



<li>In practice, CRM and CPQ work best together. CRM manages demand and deal progression. CPQ manages configuration, pricing, and quoting quality at the moment of purchase intent.</li>
</ul>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most sales teams do not struggle because they lack leads. They struggle because revenue processes break down under complexity. Products have many options, pricing has many rules, and customers expect fast responses across digital channels. <a href="/cpq-software/">CPQ software</a> makes quoting reliable and fast. It standardizes configuration and pricing logic. At the same time, CRM platforms unify customer data, activities, and sales execution across the pipeline.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When leaders ask about CPQ vs. CRM, it often reflects a deeper problem. Teams are trying to use one system to do two different jobs. CPQ and CRM are complementary, but they work with different parts of the revenue engine optimization. CPQ vs. CRM is not a winner-takes-all decision. That’s because the systems are designed around different data ownership, different workflow responsibilities, and different stakeholders. In well-run revenue operations, CPQ and CRM integration is what turns customer intent into fast, compliant, profitable offers.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is CRM</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Customer relationship management, or CRM, is commonly defined as a system for managing interactions with current and potential customers to improve relationships and grow the business.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is CPQ Software</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ stands for Configure, Price, Quote. At its simplest, CPQ software enables businesses to configure complex products and services, apply accurate pricing, and generate professional quotations quickly and consistently.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ is built to address a specific operational risk. Whenever a product or service can be sold in many combinations, manual quoting becomes slow and error-prone. CPQ improves the sales process. How? It automates product configuration, pricing, and quote generation to increase efficiency and reduce errors. And it supports producing accurate, personalized quotes faster.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">CPQ vs. CRM: Key Differences</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The simplest distinction is that CRM manages customer relationships and deal progression, while CPQ manages offer correctness, including configuration validity and pricing governance, at the moment a quote is produced.&nbsp;</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dimension</strong></td><td><strong>CRM</strong></td><td><strong>CPQ</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Primary purpose</td><td>Manage customer data and interactions, support sales execution, and relationship growth</td><td>Automate configuration, pricing, and quoting to produce fast, accurate offers</td></tr><tr><td>Core objects</td><td>Accounts, contacts, leads, opportunities, activities</td><td>Product configuration rules, product catalog, pricing rules, quote, and line items</td></tr><tr><td>Primary outcome</td><td>Pipeline visibility and predictable execution</td><td>Error-resistant quotes that protect margin and reduce cycle time</td></tr><tr><td>Typical place in the process</td><td>Broad lifecycle around selling, from lead to opportunity management</td><td>Quoting stage inside quote to cash, when offers are assembled and priced</td></tr><tr><td>Stakeholders</td><td>Sales, marketing, service, leadership</td><td>Sales, sales operations, finance, product, and legal for approvals</td></tr><tr><td>Key strength</td><td>Centralized customer context and analytics for planning</td><td>Standardized quoting with pricing and discount control</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This comparison reflects how CRM centralizes customer information for teams, while CPQ explicitly automates configuration, pricing, and quote generation and is treated as a concrete step in quote-to-cash.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Purpose and business focus</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>CRM is relationship-first: it helps teams manage interactions and customer information to improve relationships and profitability.&nbsp;</li>



<li>CPQ is transaction-precision-first: it is designed to ensure that what gets sold can actually be delivered and billed correctly by automating configuration and pricing decisions so the quote can be produced quickly and consistently.&nbsp;</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Data management and ownership</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>CRM is typically the owner of customer and opportunity data that describes who the buyer is and where a deal sits in the pipeline.&nbsp;</li>



<li>CPQ typically owns the data that describes what is being sold and the rules that govern how it must be configured, priced, and approved, often anchored in a product catalog and pricing policies.&nbsp;</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Sales workflow responsibilities</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>CRM supports the operating rhythm of selling: activity tracking, opportunity progression, and forecasting discipline that helps leadership plan without end-of-period surprises.&nbsp;</li>



<li>CPQ supports the moment where an opportunity turns into an offer: configuration validation, pricing calculation, discount approvals, and quote creation that customers can accept. This is why CPQ is often described as part of quote to cash rather than a replacement for CRM.&nbsp;</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">User roles and stakeholders</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>CRM is broadly used by sales teams and leadership, and it often serves multiple departments that need customer context and analytics.&nbsp;</li>



<li>CPQ is used heavily by sales, but it also has strong cross-functional dependencies, because pricing governance, discount approvals, and proposal consistency often involve finance and operations.&nbsp;</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How CPQ Complements CRM</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ is most valuable when it plugs into CRM at the moment a qualified deal demands a reliable, fast offer. Instead of forcing sellers to leave the CRM to build quotes in spreadsheets, CPQ can embed structured quoting inside the CRM workflow, so the quote becomes part of the opportunity record and the pipeline remains auditable.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Quote generation and configuration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ complements CRM by turning customer requirements captured in CRM into a valid product configuration. It then generates a quote based on those decisions. In practice, this reduces back-and-forth. Because the configuration step acts as a rules check before anything is promised to the customer.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Pricing automation and discount control</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Pricing is where margin leakage often happens. Especially when discounting is inconsistent across reps or regions. CPQ platforms commonly provide consistent pricing and discounting control. It includes approval workflows, which shift discounting from ad hoc behavior to governed policy.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Proposal and document generation</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many CPQ deployments extend beyond a numeric quote into proposals and documentation that are consistent and professional. This aligns with how quote-to-cash includes drafting proposals and moving toward payment. And it improves the customer experience because customers receive clearer, faster documentation.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Benefits of CRM and CPQ Integration</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CRM and CPQ integration is not just a technical project. It is an operating model decision: you are defining a single, connected path from customer context to commercial offer and from offer back into pipeline analytics and forecasting.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Improved data accuracy</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When CPQ pulls data from CRM and other systems, proposals can be produced more accurately in less time because customer context and opportunity details do not need to be re-entered manually.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Faster sales cycles</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ is designed to accelerate the sales cycle by automating configuration, pricing, and quote generation, and integration allows that speed gain to occur without breaking CRM pipeline discipline.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Better customer experience</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integrated CPQ and CRM reduce proposal errors and streamline operations, which improves the buyer experience because customers receive consistent, accurate responses without delays caused by internal rework.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Enhanced revenue predictability</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Forecasting quality depends on having accurate opportunity and quote data. CRM forecasting uses pipeline activity to generate near real-time views of expected revenue, and integration ensures that quoting outcomes map back into that model rather than living in disconnected documents.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Reduced manual errors</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Manual quoting produces errors because humans must apply complex rules repeatedly under time pressure. CPQ reduces errors by standardizing configuration and pricing logic, and integration reduces errors further by removing duplicate data entry between systems.&nbsp;</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ChatGPT-Image-9-апр.-2026-г.-18_59_59-1024x683.png" alt="Difference between CPQ and CRM" class="wp-image-2125" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ChatGPT-Image-9-апр.-2026-г.-18_59_59-1024x683.png 1024w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ChatGPT-Image-9-апр.-2026-г.-18_59_59-300x200.png 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ChatGPT-Image-9-апр.-2026-г.-18_59_59-768x512.png 768w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ChatGPT-Image-9-апр.-2026-г.-18_59_59.png 1536w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">CPQ and CRM in 3D Product Configuration</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For configurable products, buyer confidence often depends on visibility. A quote can be technically correct and still fail to convert if the customer cannot confidently imagine what they are buying. This is where visual, <a href="/configuration-software/">3D configuration</a> becomes a strategic extension of CPQ inside the CRM-led sales process.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Visual configuration in sales processes</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, visual configuration supports sales teams by reducing ambiguity. Instead of describing a configuration in words and part numbers, sellers can use a visual model that updates as configuration decisions are made, which can reduce friction in approvals and speed up quoting.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Integration with ecommerce and digital channels</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As digital selling expands, the ability to use the same configuration and pricing logic across channels becomes critical. Headless and composable commerce approaches emphasize decoupling experience layers from backend processes so that web, mobile, partner portals, and assisted sales can share the same backend logic while presenting different user experiences.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Impact on buyer decision-making</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">From a commercial perspective, the mechanism is straightforward: better visualization reduces uncertainty, which supports conversion, especially when combined with accurate real-time pricing that keeps the buyer oriented around trade-offs they can understand.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Choosing the Right CPQ for your CRM</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Selecting CPQ is not only about features. It is about fitting with your CRM data model, the complexity of your product catalog, and the scalability of your integration approach as your business grows and channels multiply.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Integration capabilities</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A CPQ must integrate cleanly with CRM so that customer data, quotes, and opportunities stay synchronized. Integration can be achieved via APIs or integrated architectures, and strong integration reduces operational friction and improves scalability.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Scalability and performance</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Scalability is not just about handling more users. It is about handling more configurations, more pricing rules, and more channels without slowing down the quoting workflow. Visual configurators also add performance requirements because rendering and real-time rules must remain responsive.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Customization and flexibility</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ must map to your real selling reality. If your configuration logic, pricing tiers, and approval workflow cannot be represented accurately, teams will revert to manual workarounds that break governance. This is why many CPQ programs prioritize rule modeling, pricing guardrails, and alignment with sales operating processes before adding cosmetic customization.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Analytics and reporting features</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CRM reporting often centers on pipeline analytics and forecasting, while CPQ reporting tends to focus on quote performance, discount patterns, and product mix. The most valuable scenario is when analytics connects the two: which configurations sell, at what discount levels, in which segments, and how those patterns influence forecast accuracy and revenue outcomes.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Common Implementation Challenges</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Implementation issues usually come from misalignment between data, process, and adoption. CPQ is extremely sensitive to upstream data quality and to the completeness of configuration and pricing logic, so weak foundations show up immediately in quoting errors and low trust.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Data synchronization issues</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data synchronization often fails when product data, pricing rules, and customer context are inconsistent across systems. Many implementation guides and postmortems point to poor data quality and underestimated complexity as recurring causes of problems, especially when migrating from legacy quoting tools.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">User adoption barriers</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even technically sound CPQ deployments can underperform if sales teams resist the new workflow. Adoption problems often occur when CPQ feels slower than old habits at first or when guided workflows do not match how sellers qualify and present solutions. Adoption improves when CPQ reduces effort, not when it adds steps.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Integration complexity</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integration complexity rises with the number of systems involved, such as ERP, billing, ecommerce, and document generation. While APIs make connectivity possible, teams still need careful mapping of which system owns which data, how updates flow, and how exceptions are handled.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Future Trends in CPQ and CRM</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CRM and CPQ are converging toward a shared goal: more automation, more intelligence, and more flexible architectures that support personalization across channels without sacrificing governance.&nbsp;</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>AI-driven sales automation</strong></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is increasingly embedded in CRM to help sellers summarize records, prepare for meetings, and execute daily tasks more efficiently. On the CPQ side, the likely path is AI-assisted configuration and quote creation. Here, automation helps recommend bundles, detect risky discounts, and speed up approvals while keeping pricing governance intact.&nbsp;</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Personalization and predictive selling</strong></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Personalization depends on trusted customer data and product logic. CRM centralizes customer information so teams have insights when needed. CPQ enforces configuration validity and pricing consistency. Together, they enable personalization that is operationally feasible. It means they tailor the offer but still govern it.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Predictive selling also depends on forecastable execution. CRM forecasting combines pipeline activity and categorization to give near real-time views of expected revenue. And this becomes more accurate when quote data and product mix are captured in structured CPQ objects rather than scattered documents.&nbsp;</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Headless and composable architectures</strong></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Composable and headless architectures are gaining attention because they decouple experience layers from backend engines. In ecommerce, headless commerce separates front-end experience from back-end processes. And composable approaches modularize more of the stack so teams can assemble best-fit components.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why CanvasLogic for CPQ and CRM Integration?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic positions its CPQ around visual configuration, real-time pricing, and CRM connectivity, which aligns with where modern selling is heading: more guided selling, more self-service, and more consistency across digital channels and assisted sales.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For complex products, CanvasLogic also emphasizes 3D configuration and a dynamic pricing engine that updates in real time as customers configure products, aiming to reduce delays and improve customer satisfaction.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Conclusion</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The highest-performing organizations do not treat this as CRM vs. CPQ. They connect the systems so that customer context flows into quoting. And quoting outcomes flow back into analytics, forecasting, and revenue management discipline. The result is less manual work, fewer errors, faster cycles, and better customer experiences across digital channels.&nbsp;</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">FAQ</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">How long does CPQ implementation typically take?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The time it takes to implement depends mostly on how complicated the product is. It also depends on how many integrations are needed.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">What industries benefit most from CPQ tools?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ is most valuable anywhere products or services are configurable, and pricing is rule-driven, especially where sales cycles require accurate proposals. Manufacturing is frequently cited because configured products have many options, compatibility constraints, and documentation requirements.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Will CPQ make the sales process too complex for non-technical users?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Guided selling methods are meant to help salespeople and customers set up complicated products even if they don&#8217;t know much about them. This is one reason why visual configurators and step-by-step configuration flows are so popular in modern CPQ design.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Is CPQ only useful for large enterprises with complex products?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CPQ is strongly associated with complex products and complex pricing. But the underlying value scales down. Any organization that needs consistent configuration, pricing governance, and faster quoting can benefit. Implementations can be phased to match maturity and size.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>On‑Premises CPQ Software Solutions [+ The Top 6 Leading Providers]</title>
		<link>https://canvaslogic.com/on-premises-cpq/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Sheardown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 14:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://canvaslogic.com/?p=2108</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Explore on-premises CPQ software, its benefits, implementation considerations, and leading providers like CanvasLogic, Tacton, Experlogix, Configit, and Cincom.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-7387b849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<div class="wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<div class="wp-block-group has-gray-background-color has-background is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Highlights</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>On-premises CPQ software is installed on a company’s own servers and infrastructure, giving enterprises full control over data, security, and system configuration.<br></li>



<li>It is often preferred by large enterprises and regulated industries that require strict compliance, data sovereignty, or deep integration with legacy systems.<br></li>



<li>Compared to cloud CPQ, on-premises deployment offers greater customization and integration flexibility, but requires higher upfront investment and ongoing maintenance.<br></li>



<li>Leading providers offering on-premises CPQ options include CanvasLogic, Infor, Tacton, Experlogix, Configit, and Cincom.<br></li>



<li>Typical implementation timelines range from 12 to 24 weeks, depending on integration complexity and infrastructure requirements.</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While most modern CPQ solutions are cloud‑based, on‑premises CPQ remains a viable solution for enterprises that need greater control over data, security, and customisation. It allows organisations to deploy <a href="/cpq-software/">CPQ software</a> on their own servers and infrastructure, maintain complete control over sensitive information, and tailor the solution to fit unique business processes. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Is On‑Premises CPQ?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On‑premises CPQ refers to CPQ software that is installed locally within an organisation’s data centre or private cloud. The system and its associated database run on hardware owned or leased by the enterprise, and are typically managed by the internal IT team. Unlike SaaS CPQ platforms that the vendor hosts, on‑premises CPQ solutions give companies full access to the underlying code, configuration files, and data. This allows them to implement deep integration with existing ERP, CRM, and manufacturing systems and to customise pricing logic, workflows, and user interfaces to a far greater extent than most cloud solutions. However, the organisation is also responsible for server provisioning, infrastructure maintenance, software updates, security patches, and compliance auditing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Key Benefits of On‑Premises Deployment</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s have a look at the key advantages of on-premises deployment:</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Data control and security</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data governance is arguably the strongest argument for running CPQ on‑premises. Because all records remain within the company’s infrastructure, businesses retain complete control over how customer information, product catalogues, and pricing rules are stored, accessed, and backed up.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Deep integration</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integrating CPQ with existing ERP, CRM, PLM, or CAD systems is easier when both reside within the same network. On‑premises solutions usually provide direct access to databases and internal APIs, enabling businesses to create custom queries and reports.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Customisation</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On‑premises CPQ platforms allow extensive customisation of user interfaces, pricing rules, product models, and workflows. SaaS Metrics notes that businesses can modify the UI and workflows so the system “fits the business like a glove” and can implement bespoke pricing rules or niche product offerings.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Offline accessibility</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Because the software resides on local hardware, on‑premises CPQ can operate without an internet connection. This capability is important for field sales teams or manufacturing plants where stable internet connections are not guaranteed. However, offline systems require manual updates and risk data inconsistency if updates are not coordinated across all devices.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="960" height="640" src="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/brooke-cagle-JBwcenOuRCg-unsplash.webp" alt="a smiling woman with a tablet" class="wp-image-2114" srcset="https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/brooke-cagle-JBwcenOuRCg-unsplash.webp 960w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/brooke-cagle-JBwcenOuRCg-unsplash-300x200.webp 300w, https://canvaslogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/brooke-cagle-JBwcenOuRCg-unsplash-768x512.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 960px) 100vw, 960px" /></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Leading On‑Premises CPQ Providers</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What would be the leading CPQ providers you can consider?</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">CanvasLogic CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic specialises in visually immersive CPQ solutions. Its CPQ platform combines a powerful rules‑driven configurator with dynamic pricing and one‑click quote generation. The solution features photorealistic <a href="/configuration-software/">3D</a> and <a href="/ar-product-configurator/">augmented‑reality product visuals</a> that allow customers to rotate, customise, and even view products in real‑world environments. It also offers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>An intuitive product configurator capable of handling variant‑rich products, with real‑time updates whenever options are selected.<br></li>



<li>A dynamic pricing engine that supports tiered pricing, volume discounts, and subscription or usage‑based models.<br></li>



<li>Automated quote and proposal generation that produces branded documents with itemised pricing and embedded product images.<br></li>



<li>Guided selling workflows that use interactive questionnaires and prompts to steer users toward optimal configurations.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic primarily markets its CPQ as a cloud solution, but it can be deployed on private infrastructure for enterprises that need on‑premises control. The vivid 3D visuals, combined with a rules engine and deep integration options, make it a strong contender for companies wanting to give customers an engaging and accurate configuration experience.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Infor CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Infor’s Configure‑Price‑Quote software delivers an image‑driven, easy‑to‑use solution aimed at manufacturing and complex product industries. A RenaissanceTech overview describes its promise: Infor CPQ enables a unified vision throughout the buying process — from order to delivery — while cutting costs and boosting profits. Key features include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>A single configurator that serves dealers, distributors, and internal sales teams, eliminating manual entry for BOMs and routings and shortening turnaround times.<br></li>



<li>Visualization tools (2D and 3D design automation) that generate configuration‑specific drawings and models.<br></li>



<li>Document automation that creates personalised proposals and submittals from any application.<br></li>



<li>Deployment options in both cloud and on‑premises environments, allowing customers to choose a model that fits their compliance or integration needs.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Infor CPQ’s strong integration with Infor ERP solutions and its focus on high‑tech manufacturing make it a solid choice for enterprises seeking an on‑premises CPQ with robust visualization and documentation capabilities.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Tacton CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tacton CPQ specialises in complex manufacturing. Its product sheet emphasises that the software captures customer requirements through guided selling and ensures that every configured solution is valid down to the Bill-of-Materials level. Core strengths include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>A powerful constraints‑based configuration engine that always finds the optimal solution and handles complex environments.<br></li>



<li>Integration capabilities with major CRM, ERP, and PLM systems, including Salesforce, SAP, Microsoft Dynamics, and CAD tools like SOLIDWORKS and Autodesk Inventor.<br></li>



<li>Automatic generation of accurate proposals, BOMs, user manuals, and spare parts lists, speeding up quotation cycles.<br></li>



<li>Ease of implementation and maintenance—Tacton notes that the system can be set up and run with internal resources and requires no programming expertise to modify.<br></li>



<li>Multi‑channel support (direct, partner, and self‑service portals) and global deployment options.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company offers on‑premises software with 24/7 access to its support system and access to product and technology releases. This mix of powerful configuration technology and flexible deployment makes Tacton a leader for manufacturers needing a high‑performance on‑premises CPQ.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Experlogix CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Experlogix provides a flexible CPQ solution known for its deep integration with Microsoft Dynamics 365. An Intershop profile highlights that Experlogix’s integration is certified by Microsoft and ready upon installation. Notable attributes include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Deployment flexibility — hosted on Microsoft Azure or installed on‑premises.<br></li>



<li>Real‑time visualisation and the ability to read from and write to Dynamics 365, triggering CRM workflows and generating accurate Bills‑of‑Materials and routings in Finance &amp; Supply Chain Management or Business Central.<br></li>



<li>A professional services team with experience across hundreds of implementations worldwide, helping customers tailor the system and manage the total cost of ownership.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Experlogix is well-suited for organisations already invested in Microsoft ecosystems and looking for a CPQ solution that can be hosted on private infrastructure without losing cloud‑like integration benefits.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Configit (Configit Quote &amp; Configit Ace)</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Configit’s CPQ platform combines a powerful rules engine with its patented Virtual Tabulation® technology. Configit Ace®, its configuration lifecycle management platform, offers both cloud‑based and on‑premises deployment options; the cloud service provides the same capabilities as the existing on‑premises offering, allowing customers to choose the deployment that suits them. Configit Quote® is positioned as “the world’s most powerful enterprise CPQ solution” and leverages Virtual Tabulation to handle highly complex product models. Important features include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>A powerful configuration engine that manages thousands of rules with high performance.<br></li>



<li>Accurate master data by importing information from ERP or PLM systems, eliminating sales errors.<br></li>



<li>Flexible and adaptable user interfaces, customisable approval rules, and multiple integrations (SAP, Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics, and more).<br></li>



<li>A modelling environment that lets businesses extend product definitions and create new models without programming.<br></li>



<li>Out‑of‑the‑box certified integration to SAP for faster implementation.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Configit’s on‑premises option appeals to enterprises that need deep integration with legacy systems, high configurability, and advanced product modelling capabilities.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Cincom CPQ</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cincom CPQ is designed for complex manufacturers who need to accelerate and simplify sales cycles. A SoftwareOne marketplace description notes that Cincom CPQ tailors every aspect of product and service offerings, giving businesses full control to maximise revenue and supporting both cloud‑based and on‑premises deployments. Key features include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Advanced product configuration capabilities with a flexible rules engine for precise customisation.<br></li>



<li>Predefined pricing rules that automate quoting and eliminate human error.<br></li>



<li>Automated generation of polished, professional proposals in multiple formats.<br></li>



<li>Seamless integration with CRM and ERP systems to streamline the entire sales process.<br></li>



<li>Platform flexibility supporting cloud, hosted, and on‑premises deployments. A Cincom data sheet emphasises that CPQ is equally effective whether deployed cloud‑based, hosted, or on‑premises, providing agility and flexibility for unique user interfaces and workflows.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cincom’s ability to integrate with legacy systems while offering on‑premises or cloud deployment makes it attractive for manufacturers balancing customisation and control with modern integration requirements.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Implementation Considerations for On‑Premises CPQ</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What to bear in mind when deploying on-premises CPQ?</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Infrastructure requirements</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deploying on‑premises CPQ means your organisation must supply and manage the physical infrastructure — servers, storage, networking, and database systems — that power the application. This includes ensuring sufficient capacity for concurrent users, redundancy for high availability, and secure connectivity between CPQ and other enterprise systems.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On‑premises CPQ often requires significant upfront investment. SaaS Metrics notes that hardware and software licences can cost tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars, and ongoing expenses include maintenance, compliance audits, and scalability upgrades.&nbsp;</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">IT team and maintenance</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Operating on‑premises CPQ demands a capable IT team. Your staff must handle installation, patching, user administration, security monitoring, and disaster recovery. Unlike cloud solutions, where the vendor performs updates automatically, on‑premises CPQ requires manual updates and backups.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">On‑Premises vs. Cloud CPQ</h2>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-regular"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><th>Deployment and control</th><th>On-premises</th><th>Cloud</th></tr><tr><td>Deployment and control</td><td>Installed on your own servers; full control over data, security, and customisations</td><td>Hosted by the vendor, rapid deployment, but less control over the underlying infrastructure</td></tr><tr><td>Costs and investment</td><td>Requires large licence fees and hardware CAPEX; longer implementation (12–24 weeks)</td><td>Subscription‑based; lower upfront costs but ongoing OPEX</td></tr><tr><td>Security and compliance</td><td>Tailored security protocols to meet industry‑specific regulations; full responsibility for patches</td><td>Vendor provides security certifications (e.g., SOC 2, ISO); compliance managed by the provider</td></tr><tr><td>Maintenance and updates</td><td>The IT team manages updates, backups, and maintenance; risk of outdated systems if not maintained</td><td>Automatic updates and patches; vendor handles infrastructure and disaster recovery</td></tr><tr><td>Scalability and accessibility</td><td>Limited by local hardware; scaling requires procuring new servers and infrastructure; offline mode available</td><td>Elastic; easily add users or compute resources; global access through browsers</td></tr><tr><td>Customisation and integration</td><td>Deep customisation of UI, pricing logic, and workflows; direct integration with legacy ERP/CRM systems</td><td>Usually limited to configuration options provided by the vendor; API‑based integrations may not cover all legacy systems</td></tr></thead></table></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why Choose CanvasLogic?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CanvasLogic stands out among on‑premises CPQ solutions because it transforms quoting into an immersive, visual experience. Its 3D and augmented‑reality configurators let customers see the exact product they are ordering, reducing miscommunication and increasing confidence. The platform combines this visual experience with a dynamic pricing engine, automated proposal generation, and guided selling workflows.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Conclusion</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On‑premises CPQ software remains a strategic choice for enterprises that prioritise data sovereignty, deep integration with legacy systems, and extensive customisation. By hosting CPQ on their own servers and infrastructure, businesses gain unmatched control over security and compliance, can tailor the system to their unique workflows, and even support offline operations when necessary. However, this control comes at the cost of higher capital investment, longer implementation timelines, and ongoing maintenance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Selecting the right on‑premises CPQ solution involves balancing these trade‑offs against the needs of the organisation. Providers such as CanvasLogic, Infor, Tacton, Experlogix, Configit, and Cincom offer robust options with varied strengths — from immersive 3D visuals to powerful constraint‑based engines and deep ERP integrations. Understanding your enterprise’s infrastructure, data governance requirements, and customization needs will help you determine whether an on‑premises deployment is the best fit or whether a hybrid or cloud model might deliver greater agility. Regardless of the deployment model, modern CPQ is evolving rapidly, and investing in the right solution can dramatically improve sales efficiency, accuracy, and customer satisfaction.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">FAQ</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How long does a typical on‑premises CPQ implementation project take?</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Implementation timelines vary by complexity and vendor, but on‑premises deployments generally take longer than cloud implementations. The GrexPro comparison notes that on‑premises CPQ automation projects often span 12-24 weeks, as they involve hardware provisioning, custom middleware, and data migration. Complex integrations with ERP/CRM systems or the need to rebuild legacy data structures can extend the timeline further.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Can on‑premises CPQ software be integrated with cloud‑based CRM?</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yes. Most modern on‑premises CPQ solutions offer robust APIs and connectors to integrate with cloud CRM systems. Tacton’s CPQ integrates with Salesforce and Microsoft Dynamics, enabling sales teams to use cloud‑based CRM while the CPQ engine runs on‑premises. Configit Quote and Experlogix CPQ similarly provide integrations with SAP, Salesforce, and Dynamics. While integration is possible, it may require custom middleware and careful mapping of data across systems.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>How does on‑premises CPQ handle compliance with regulations like GDPR or ITAR?</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On‑premises CPQ allows companies to keep all data within their own facilities, making it easier to implement customised security controls and meet regulatory requirements. SaaS Metrics explains that businesses can tailor security protocols to meet specific compliance standards and control backups and recovery processes. However, the enterprise must ensure that user access is properly managed (e.g., via role‑based access controls and multi‑factor authentication) and that data is encrypted at rest and in transit. Regular audits, patch management, and staff training are essential to remain compliant.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
